Semjase is telling about all the things Earth have missed because of not choosing another path from about 1920. And she is telling about galactic imperialism. And more. Channelled by Tore Alfstad.

"They are very sly when it comes to manipulation, and it is all given a frame of positive energies to fool people. Only when one goes deeper into the materiel can such groups be disclosed. The goal of the Annuakies when it comes to Earth, is that the planet shall be a state of slaves that looks on the Annuakies as gods and do exactly what they says." Channelled by Tore Alfstad.

A fully translated version will come in my future book: "Introduction to Paraphysics, and belonging paradigms".

Please copy this E-mail to someone you think may take interest in it. Those e-mails servers which do not take attachments will not receive this e-mail. Therefore may it be sent out once more to everyone in a couple of days, if not too many are angry because of receiving this e-mail.

1. From the galactic confederation Erran section

A survey over a possible future situation on Earth and a retrospect on the past situation.

As known, Earth has been subject for attention from several cosmic civilisations through history. This has also imprinted civilisations that live on Earth today. Earth form a part of important plans certain negative civilisations have concerning their wish of future dominance in the galaxy. These use several methods to influence Earth for their purposes. The philosophy of life in these civilisations is often strong atheistic, deterministic and materialistic. The negative civilisations are using scientific prestige combined with a special direction within economical thinking to influence the collective consciousness on Earth. Their purpose is a strong hierarchical built form of society with a strong materialistic ground attitude philosophy of life, and an expansionistic out-turned politic that presuppose continuous "economic" growth based on exploitation of natural recourses on Earth and else in the universe. To be able to maintain such a civilisation on long term it is compelled to expand outwards in the galaxy and take recourses on other planets. In older times it did exist such an imperium in the galaxy based on these ground ideas. However, this was stroked back by a confederation of different other civilisations in cosmos. As said; the ground thought to such a civilisation is strong materialistic, and do often have the focus that everything is matter. They have a one-life perspective based on this way of thinking. In consequence they brush aside higher spiritual truths and everything that has connection to these. Therefore, their one-dimensional world picture defines itself the border that their technology will butt against. Unfortunately for the people of earth your science have been inspired and steered by this view. These negative elements try to control the population of earth by means of economic tools in combination with chemical medical science. It has been, and is continuing, very much research on chemicals and gene manipulated organisms that can influence peoples attitudes and feelings. All out from a pure materialistic world understanding. Inside more secret environments of science they are also doing research on electromagnetic mind-control. To make a far-reaching positive change to happen in your civilisation, the foundation of the world picture of your science have to be changed away from the materialistic mal to a form that includes the higher spiritual principles and the multidimensionality of the universe. The "professional" environment in your scientific institutions is often everything else than democratic, and founds themselves nearly on a fascistic foundation of ideas. This was expressed, among other thing, as ideas among doctors in the 1930’s about that one should "exterminate" persons with "genetic" weaknesses (so called eugenics / racial hygiene). These were ideas that Hitler, among others, made use of in his idea foundation, and the world know how that went. Unfortunately is not the ground attitude in several of your scientific environment changed essential since then. The science you call psychology is permeated, among other things, by these ideas, and act as an inquisition tool for the materialistic model of thinking as your science is ruled along. Your future thematic scientists uses this way of thinking as their bases when they try to see what kind of technology you will get in the future. Things as anti gravitation and teleportation are therefore not included in their visions. The negative forces are among other things inspiring people to develop strong violent and war focused computer games which among other thing is simulating use of advanced weapon systems onboard in spaceships. The scenario in such games is often that one shall fight against certain extraterrestrial civilisations that in one or another way are threatening earth. This is completely deliberate inculcated into your civilisation from other negative galactic civilisations that wishes influential power by weapons in the galaxy. The truth is that a person that have trained on such simulation games, can be put directly into a war spaceship and will be able to master it fully after about one weak of training. This because of all his basic reflexes to operate the weapon system of a spaceship of war in a battle situation already is drilled. The negative civilisations have plans to use these persons in a future galactic conflict. Because of things that are mentioned here, your civilisation has been unnecessary retarded both technically and spiritually. Several inventions that really could help your civilisation have thus been suppressed. We have also stopped some inventions, because misuse of these could have gotten to huge negative consequences, both for your civilisation and for other civilisations in the universe. This has as a rule been things and systems that originally was meant used in connection to weapons and tools for general suppression of the population. We have also inspired to development of new technology. This is primarily with information technology and data. We have not stopped all inventions that base upon utilization of free energy, or utilization of anti-gravitation. Negative forces in your own scientific environment and military force have done that. What development would have found place in your civilisation if your science did not have a suppressing attitude? Around 1920 you would probably have anti gravitation. In consequence your aeroplane technology that is dominating in your world today would not have been developed. The automobile (car) would gotten minimal spreading and would be historic around 1950 by then everybody would have cheap anti gravitation vehicles that was driven by free energy. Asphalt would not have been used, and your roads would have been limited for walks and bicycling. Around 1930 you would have had electrical power stations based on free energy. Oil, coal and nuclear power based energy production would not have been developed. It had just been a few oil companies that produced oil for use in plastic that would have been developed. Around 1948 every home would have their own electricity aggregates, so that long power lines in nature would have been avoided. It is not fore sure that nuclear power systems would have been developed on your planet at all. That is if Tesla had obtained full through-punch for his ideas, when you in that case would have energy enough. On that point of time you sat the foot on the moon 1969 you would probably have developed space travel advanced enough to reach my home planet Erra. That would mean you would have had interstellar space travel already in 1967. Around 1973 you would have developed electronic and other components that was advanced enough that you could take use of teleportation as transport form internally on your planet. Around 1980 your space travel would have developed so much that you could reach other galaxies. Your world would have been clean and without those climate, atmosphere and ozone problems you are facing now. All this you failed to obtain because you let yourself be ruled by power sick and materialistic scientists and militaries. Those who really should be sent to your court in Haag charged for criminal acts against humanity is exactly those individuals within science and military which is responsible for the present way of thinking and suppressions in connection to this. We will not accept that the cultures you have created until now without control are spread into the galaxy, possibly in cooperation with other civilisations with a negative imperialistic agenda. We will therefore intervene before that happens. We from the erran side supports fully Steven Greer’s disclosure project. This is because this project has the potential to change the course your civilisation is heading against, which we would like to be different. If the project meets total ignorance in media we are tempted to use our technology to influence the right persons in media so the message gets to the public.

+

Channelling received by Tore Alfstad 6. August 2001 from Semjase.

Translated from Norwegian by Tor Opdahl 24.november 2002. I’m sorry if some sentences are norw-english.

Back to front page

 

 

Chapter 43

Back to front page


Proposals for a peaceful solution in Iraq



 

This chapter is especially written for the present situation on Earth. It is sent to many politicians, newspaper and TV-stations around the world. I hope the reader like it, and will send it further to people on your email-list, who perhaps might be interested in it.

Tor Opdahl

March 11^th 2003

 

2. Worst case scenario

During this chapter I have investigated the worst case path of Earth from its present situation. I have built in key element scenarios from the Bible and Nostradamus. They seam all to fit in introduced by the Hawk-era of Americans politics, the USA-Israel coalition and Ariel Sharon as a great Asian leader with enormous power, through Zionism and secret societies.

This is not a chapter for sceptics. I have tried to draw the big picture, from ancient history to a galactig future, from the Atlantis-tradgedy, via a third world war and towards galactic imperialsm. I have investigated human consciousness, also capable of sending and receiving darkness, a kind of telepathy, a kind of channelling, of other negative beings and their agendas. By that, everything seams to fall into place, for the worst case scenarios to happen.

With the Hawk/Sharon era, there seams to be more production of enemies rather than reducing them. It also seams like certain forces, on both sides, wants to create enemies on purpose.

A lot of the American acts, proposals and attitude seams to channel: "preserving and creating enemies", from dark forces inside their own country, which may lead to the worst case scenarios.

Worst case scenarios depends on fallen souls of possible white forces. Colin Powell have argued hawks and those who speaks about the "the evil axis" into position, forces he will not be able to control himself. He is still a man with better balanced views than the rest of the USA-gang, but he represents a splittet toung, their white alibi, and the rest of the world do therefore have to take charge themselves.

March 7^th George W. Bush did once again say he will throw away the UN path, and go to war alone. Ref. www.dagbladet.no/nyheter/2003/03/08/363423.html.

World security may depend on people being observable and expose the beings capable to draw Earth in negative directions. That could in many cases depend on key individuals being disloyal, which in this matter is to be loyal to Earth and the forces of light.

 

3. Proposing some
   solutions/attitudes

During this chapter am I also proposing some solutions / attitudes that may avoid the worst case scenarios. I am proposing all from the most simple (and effective), as walking out on the streets, to already existing ways of looking on the Iraq question, and what to put / what not to put in possible new UN resolution.

The world fluctuates between to great scenarios: A great Muslim Western war and an Economic war against the USA. One can be chosen. Both can be chosen. Both can be avoided. For the moment seams a great Western-Muslim war to be the most probable, even if Europe/Russia/China are taking position against the American / Great Britain solutions and possible acting on their own.

The USA has run a though and manipulative game outside decistions in the UN, and are present with strong forces in Iraq, still capable of getting it as their hawk-forces wants, which gradually could lead to the worst case scenarios. Worst case of the worst case scenarios is that USA acts on their own by democratic permission, which would make it more difficult to stop the wild horse, now, in years, even in decades, because of a massive rise of opposing the Israel/USA evil would be more difficult to direct.

But that is up for us today to decide.

If the great war starts, people may only see evil against evil, and could perhaps not be so focused on the Americans starting the war. People will be focused on the great terrorist act starting the war, perhaps done by Antichrist himself, without the world knowing it.

Even with such a scenario, it would be fare more dangerous to let the Americans loose, than to fight down evil strategically, by bulding bridges between the positive forces in each country of the world.

The world must not be foreign to go into an economic war against the USA, because they are now giving rise to the most dangerous forces of Earth, and denies Earth from introducing more positive thinking and paths.

Going into the galaxtic era positively means that Earth are capable to expose the negative forces capable of manipulating us.

 

4. Third world war

It was a so called channelling laid out on the Internet (late 1998 or early 1999), claimed to be from Jesus, as one of first tipped my that certain forces wishes a great war in the Middle East. It plays no role if I believe in that or not, because I have found it very probable. Strong forces wants that; a war, a great war, in the Middle East, perhaps also other places.

 

5. Personal
   intelligence
   services

In the same period, I think, late 1998 – early 1999, I saw an American movie or series on television, where the issue in a section of the movie was white Americans planting nuclear bomb(s) in another country, tro create an enemy. I did then get a strong beep in my left ear.

I do have personal "intelligence services", not telling me things by voices, but beeps me when certain metafors in my outer world and/or thinking in my inner world are in certain contexts. Most of what I write is independent philosophy, spiced with some speculations now and then. That do the reader have to judge from.

The beepings startet late 1992, and I have concluded them to be from own individuals, that I am not capable to see. The beepings do never come in situations where there is nothing to learn from them, but it may happen sometimes that I do not understand what the beep wanted to tell me. It may also happen that I misunderstand the beep, and draws it towards not entirely correct conclusions. Somethimes, when I do not understand, I get som correcting beeps, turns me into the path, something they regards very important.

 

6. Loyal disloyal

I stay loyal to my inner helpers, as my highest loyal source of beings. This chapter is of a very difficult balance, and I have secured to not send it out before allowed and well balanced, even if itching to send something of it out earlier.

They advised me that I had more to write. But I had to take the final decition, did I not? This is not an alien or beyond agenda. I wrote this chapter. I had to take the final decition. I am the one to blaim. I am responsible for it. They gave me advises according to my own will. But my will is a voice of Earth. I am to be regarded as a participator of the many voices of Earth. But I am also a voice that looks down to Earth observing the present situation, from that point of view. I am both voices. I am responsible.

I am sceptical about telling about this source of mine, because someone could se it as me getting directions directly from God and that God are not speaking to the rest of you. That is not true. I think God speaks to and through everybody, no matter what view you have on God/Nature.

 

7. Necessary with solutions from seeing beyond sceptisim

I am not claiming to be all correct.

But out from my heart I say: I want to tell the reader about the great news that we are not alone. I want to tell the reader that this chapter is not written from unnecessary scepticism. I want to tell the reader that I draws pictures from knowing about the beyond, and from that knowledge I draw a wider perspective for the present situation than the sceptics wants me to.

Such pictures may even be necessary to be able to see solutions for our time. But sadly enough, the Sirians, some of our galactic friends observing Earth, do not seam to see it that way.

This chapter is not for sceptics. The sceptics may instead read chapter 18.

I regard religion as dangerous too. But I also regard it necessary to see above truths of today’s sceptism.

 

8. Chapter for you

I do not think this chapter is ment to persuade key persons in this key time of history, even if my hope, emailing it out, is that key perons shall read it. That will probably not be the case during these stressed times. This chapter may probably work as an alternative way to look at things in the long run, and that is what I mostly wants to track my writings into, setting a general print of history, present and possible future.

My beepers have never tracked me into criticing specific individuals. That is my own choice.

They have neither tracked me into criticising those who are named "the Sirians". That is my own choice.

This entiry chapter is my own choice, even if I am tracked into it. I am the one to be blaimed, if some relative views are limited and incorrect. This chapter is fully my responsibility.

 

9. Producing enemies and planting nuclear weapon programmes

My beep when waching television that day was in the context of Americans planting nuclear bombs / nuclear weapon programs. I do not know if my helpers wanted my attesion to a general happenings, including many types of weapons. But I have stikked to the angle that Americans are doing such things. I knew that hidden forces in the USA have kept UFO’s and belonging technology secret for decades, probably not all because of making the big advantage for the next huge war, playing the Heros. My opinion is that those heros have kept us away from something that throught the decades all together have crated far more cruelty than the second world war.

I think, that if a nuclear bomb explodes in the near future, for example in the USA, then it could this just as much have been caused by western white skinned dark forces as eastern dark forces, pure manipulative produced.

Nothing is yet given for how Earth manages to handle its dark forces, which exists just as much in the USA and Israel as in other countries. A possible scenario, perhaps the most probable today (2003), could just as probably become that the back stage forces for the Israel-USA-coalition blows a nuclear bomb, or just the Zionist behind stage forces, perhaps in the USA, blame it on others, and gags therefore the world with "what did we say" – "hereafter you have to listen to us", and power-takes therefore a strengthened and worsified world dominion.

 

10. Judging on factors

I cannot prove my inner direction giving helpers. Neither can the reader. We will not be heard, like the conspiracy theorists will neither, if we claim the Americans are planting weapons on purpose to create enemies. Therefore we have to judge on the factor, like collecting stamps. Earth have to evaluate seriously if creating enemies on purpose is going on, not just because of Isreali and American stupidity.

To be able to judge correctly, I think we have to understand there exists both positive and negative forces in the USA. The acts and statements from the USA are mixed, sometimes resulting to positivity and sometimes to negativity. But I also think we have to understand that dark forces have had an enormous dangerous hidden power on the USA, as in every country, which have directed Earth, with USA in chief position, with hidden communication lines, in negative directions.

I think the reader will understand, that my heart belongs to the Americans as well, but that I now have to confront USA as a totality.

It could be even more difficult to stop the Americans if not collecting negative factors, like collecting stamps, and use it against them, perhaps later in an UN court or resolution.

If not collecting the factors, the Americans will go on and on and on, because the world will not be able to use strength and arguments enough against them.

We have seen how USA is using collected factors in the UN, but not good enough to convince the world to go into the path they wants. I think world security may depend on Earths capability to collect factors against USA. If the Earth not is willing to do that, I think USA is more than willing to collect factors against others, probably most against their evil axis. Supervising Earth is good, but not in the way the Americans are doing it. Earth needs also the supervising of the USA.

I appreciate that the positive part of USA wants to supervise positively, but not that dark synthesis in many ways seams to control much of this.

 

11. Some collected factors on possibly creating enemies on purpose

We may ask

1. Lack of diplomacy in Afganistan: Did they want Osama Bin Laden to go free, as a needed enemy, and observe which country he went into?
2. Two of Osamas sons caught March 6/7^th 2003. Denied by the Americans. Was that denial a lie? (There could of course be many reasons for such a denial).
3. Did they tell Saddam Hussain to leave the country, within 72 hours, just to keep him as a free enemy, and to observe what country he goes into? Would the Americans go to war anyway, because of still present danger and a nation giving rise to Saddam? Did they want Saddam to leave the country because of wanting an easy catch of the first step?
4. Do they want to go to war in Iraq, no matter what, because they wants to increase the possibilities that Saddam digs up more weapons, creating him to a far greater danger than he is under the UN control today?
5. Are the Americans planning to make this to establish themselves in the area?
6. Is it about oil? Is it about economics? Is it about power? Is it a combination? Ref. for instance www.motherjones.com/news/feature/2003/10/ma_273_01.html
7. Do the Americans create enemies because of all the things above?
8. Are the Americans very strategically making their acts and statements just to be alone / the chief of taking and ruling Iraq?
9. Have the Americans provoked the North Koreans on purpose, or are the Americans just very stupid?

1. Directions?

(March 8^th 2003)

Are these factors just speculations? – I think a lot of the American acts and statements point in such directions; creating enemies. Statements from the Hawks shows that the next country could become North Korea. The Americans are provoking in that area too. Other belives Iran could be the next country. (ref. Nils Jordet, Dagbladet March 9^th 2003)

North Korea is of course a problem, but I think that easier would be solved if removing the Bush-administration, replacing it with a bunch of hippies, and asking the hippies / North Koreans over for a drink. The hippies should of course dress well and act representative, and perhaps not to much either.

I think we should realise that some politicians would do better by doing nothing.

Making hard demands, from limited hierarchical thinkers like some Americans, against sentriflatical thinkers as the North Koreans, do I not think is the wisest thing to do. I saw Colin Powell did send over a hippy-like person to North Korea, but I do not think that will help enough, since the Bush-administration is using its sables too much.

I think the collected factors and paths of creating enemies are not totally conscious for many of those who are dragging in such directions. But many of them seams to be conscious on creating enemies, but perhaps not all of them are bearing in mind biblical and Nostradamian scenarios. If they do, they probably see it from the angle of necessary Heroism of our time.

An even higher level may be galactic imperialism, "helpers" or influencers of a darker purpose than I regard those inner helpers of mine.

Galactic imperialism and inner influencers are debated more later in this chapter.

 

2. Building the world
   into a funnel

Primitivity is equal in size both in East and Vest. Confrontations of the negative have to be done. Confrontations in form of war should be avoided and may make bad worse, where evil just will multibly and reinforce.

What seams clear is that while strong forces tries to forth-provoke enemy pictures; we and them,- the intencification of more positive forces’ attempt to build bridges is needed, integrating via communication and cooperation.

Earth is in a cleaning up phase, putting demands for that these things, this and that, - do we not want to have. That regimes with Bush and Sharon as front figures for that do I not think will serve the best for Earth develloment. They are the provocators and the manipulators. Their regimes are building the world into a self justifying funnel, which ends into: "What did we say, hereafter you have to listen to us". - Then is a third world war close.

The ages of the Hawks is established, from beyond stage to fully taking place on the stage, and will continue to grow, even without Sharon and Bush in power positions.

 

3. Ariel Sharon
   as Antichrist

Antichrist and the third world war is by many people predicted to come in that way; that darkness first plays the cowl of light. Thereafter his growth will be by creating enemies, play on fear, and on this way bring the world into the unthinkable. I have claimed that biblical and nostradamian scenarios are possible to avoid, because ot the countless possible parallell time tracks in the total existence, the eternal now, where linear time is successions of states of already exising consciousness, like creating paths and worlds by focusing back and forth on a picture, creating loops, time-sharing and time-splitting by X and Y’s, and more.

But time can be a strong river. I have today strong doubts that we have managed to avoid the track leading to the third world war, status January 30^th 2003 / March 8^th 2003. It seam that the track of the third world war is reintroduced.

Ariel Sharon has emerged as the best candidate as Antichrist ever, in my point of view, or as the top chief for what can be called the spirit Antichrist, like Christ also just is a titling on a spirit (not nessesarily individualised) that have taken residence in the individual, or opposite; the individual have taken residence in the spirit.

Ariel Sharon is a person the consciously are doing provocations and terror, and gets away with it, because of, among other things, being protected by the big cowl of the USA. Ariel Sharon has a long history on building himself up on the enemy / fear relationchip, and it is probable that his cruelty around his martial provocation just will increase in extent, especially if a long war against Iraq, Bush’ "evil axis" and the Muslim world starts up. Then we can quickly get that he gets a chief role in the battle against the Muslim world, such he is already having conversations with Bush about when to start the war (ref. for instance English media late January 2003)

Ariel Sharons great advantage to step forward as the king of evil, is that he today is well hidden between Gorge W. Bush and Saddam Hussain.

I will not look away from that freemasons and equal religious people consider Saddam Hussain to be the potensial Antichrist, or was the potesial Antichrist. But the same freemasons should wisely not rule out Ariel Sharon possibly becoming the biggest figure for darkness on Earth, and in a general sphere where my proposal can be regarded as one of the many Day of Judgements prophets, I do not think many of the freemasons will rule out my proposal at once, like many other will.

 

4. World security may depend on disloyalty

If freemason and people in other hidden orders should see this potential threat, then they should understand that world security may depend on them being disloyal towards their own hierarchy structures, which on the top and in the periphery seams to be controlled by darker forces, and perhaps by Zionist forces themselves. Perhaps the control is not so conscious, but structures of mind interpheres.

Time may depend on that profiled persons are allowed to step forward, even if they have another important job and another important role to take care of.

If for instance freemasons, in their positions, fights against that (profiled) persons can burn for something privately, and at the same time do their job neutral, then this can be one of the many factors which builds under and allows a third world war. This is my advice to the chief of the Norwegian state television channel (NRK), Mr. Bernander. I choose to see your role as the freemason in many decitions, not as the chief.

www.dagbladet.no/nyheter/2003/03/07/363381.html, claims there is no hidden messages in Oslama Bin Ladens intervjues. I think a lot of those proclaims is projections of people doing such things themselves. Freemasons, and the level above, have their own codes (ref. www.ligth1998.com, temporarily off, ref. perhaps illiminati-news@comacast.net). I think Bernander knows those codes, and that using them in democracy is against Norwegian laws.

My helpers told me to investigate such things as secret codes more, but I have not had the time for it. Bernander may be dangerous if he denies to expose it. I guess they are using those codes for instance when the rates of interests are going to be changed, useful to rearrange ones disposals in time, if necessary, especially when the sentral bank chief do not notify it for the public on forehand. - I do not know. It is pure speculations.

Secret language and codes among military personell I can understand very well. But if secret societies, ruling some of the security thinking, in negative paths, - then I think it is very dangerous. It is also very dangerous for world security it such people control paths of economic thinking.

 

5. Confronting
   on both sides

Time depends on that we are confronting negative forces on both sides. To start a war in Iraq could be to confront wrong. Everybody agrees on that Saddam Hussain must be disarmed. But not everybody is as hot tempered as USA to start a war no matter what, as the only possible way. I think that the pressure now is present anyway, February 5^th 2003, and that this sphere must be made the most out of until the last minute, until it possibly shows up to not work anyway.

 

6. About removing
   Saddam Hussain

(February 5 + March 9th 2003)

It does not seam that Saddam Hussain can be removed on democratic terms, by the Iraqis themselves, because the votes of the Iraqi people seams to be given from pure fear, and therefore 99% of the votes for Saddam.

Saddam Hussein is probably a man that himself is imprinted with a lot of fear, behind all the people he stays behind, and behind his thick shells.

George W, Bush is also just a boy with a lot of fear. Among the fears is not being liked, and he wants to be a big man, like his father. To become a big man, he will not like to loose the Iraq question.

Leaders of fear will often lead astray this further to their own people.

The Americans are thinking about Saddam Hussain: We will remove him, by taking his life, war!, which is the way to render harmless a very dangerous person. Is that right? – Perhaps. Perhaps not. – I do not think it will be a harmless situation, a dangerous man against another dangerous man, a hated nation for a while leading another nation, uncertainty, chaos. Perhaps Heroism for the public in that area just after the liberation, but thereafter it may be harder. The USA may decide to rule longer than planned, and be present with strong military forces for years (as planned), because of fearing mass destruction weapons still are digged into the ground. Figths may continue, USA becomes even more unpopular, and terrorist acts increases.

I do not like to say it, but to remove Saddam, in the way of the hamburger nation, can be more dangerous than not doing it.

 

7. Saddam Hussain,
   reincarnation
   and revenge


Spirits lives on, both in the physical, where the person comes from, and in the non-physical, the place where the person comes to. Life and consciousness is not a result from lifeless particles in combination. Particles/forces do not work over distances with empty space between. Eveything is one, and consciousness transfers to behind the quantum fluctuating level, which the quantum physists believes is particles jumping from nothingness.

God is like the ocean. If one tries to remove a handful from it, the ocean immediately will cover the place. Negative individuals, or negativity in general, will no matter what have to be transform to positivity one or another place in the wholeness. "Dead" people in lower astral levels will be able to act negative influential on the physical Earth level. They will not have the same physical power, here and now. They will not have the same physical power, here and now, but will over a very long time rebuild again, but probably on a compleate other place and other individuals, if they still choses to be negative. They will now and then come back to the same place (Earth) if they are carrying on a revenge thought through "eternity", which I understand Earth have had negative experiences with before, but in other contexts and with other lengths of lives, infiltration, finally resulting to the Atlantis tradegy (ref. diverse literature).

Earth today is a setting where before life memory is forgotten, but where individual can channel their basic negativity from previous lives. There exists time-sharing, for you and me, for clairvoyant people, but also for very negative individuals, channelling their own soul.

I will not refer to any specific literature. Instead the reader may philosophise on the different possibillities we can have, provided that life after the physical death do in fact exist. Given that different kind of lives on "the other side" do exist, that the law on energy constancy is wrong in a physical perspective, but not in the perspective of the wholeness, - then the reader can philosophise over if there can exist influence, positive and negative, between the physical and world we cannot sense. Is there certain structures of mind negative influence can work through?

 

8. Forces of light will have lesser to fear

For that these negative individuals shall be able to come back, and continue being negative, depends on that there exists a darkness they can introduce themselves via. The pure light will never have anything from the forces of darkness. Besides, in surroundings of much light will not these negative energies reach through to just as well to the potencial more negative individuals, unless infiltrating over very long time, lowering the light. Opposite will the potential negative individuals join a rising in light.

 

9. Bottle politics

George W. Bush did not kill bad thoughts with the bottle. He did not kill a negative spirit of the USA by putting people in the electric chair. Will he be able to kill terrorism by bottle politics?

 

10. Rendering harmless
    by removing fear

To "remove" a person can also be done by removing the fear from that person. His security could be guarantied if he goes voluntarily from his power position, to save many human lives. UN-forces (not USA) could go into Iraq on peaceful terms, in curable cooperation / agreement with the Muslim world.

But I do not think Saddam will let himself be persuaded to leave his position, or that western war agreesors will allow an attempt to do it in this way. We do not know if it will work before anybody tries. Every individual shall sooner or later walk tha path of light, then why not try from this very moment, also my redusing ones own hate, and ones own fear, Mr. Bush?

The game seams to be about who is going to be the Hero and who is not. Then the good Americans should be psychologist and tell Mr. Bush what is real Heroism in these matters, if the Americans are capable of doing that.

I do not even know if I believe in my own proposal; protecting Saddam, but I have great beliefs in that a gowing mature world will think more and more in that way, generally speaking, avoiding war, but of course judging from case to case. At the same time should of cource these individuals be left out from intercourse, manipulative power and infiltrative power.

I have greater belief in my own proposal, protecting Saddam, or keeping him at power, if he continues to be cooperative, and even more cooperative.

 

11. Making George W. Bush a Hero

The Americans should tell Goerge W. Bush that the Americans have participated well, in making Saddam cooperative, and that this is Heroism enough. Tell the man that it is Heroism to follow the security counsel and Earth democracy. Tell the man that following the minds of the Hawks is not Heroism. Tell him listening to the Hawks could result to a third world war. Tell him that his acts of his own will result in USA not being the Heros, especially in the long run.

Hollywood seam to see that. Gerge W. Bush, you should listen to those who knows about the game of Heroism. You should not listen to those who make all (space) aliens enemies, creating unnecessary fear in the human hearth, but generally speaking, you should listen to Hollywood, status March 9^th 2003.

I do not know the correct balance against George W. Bush. Making him a Hero to much could intoxicate his spiritual hierarchical heart too much, like also Colin Powell seams to be a cowboy these days, like he foresaw, being part of the Bush administration.

I would not in any case look on Bush as a Hero, because I think Earth would have managed this better without USA, USA status Hawk and secrecy ruled.

 

12. A possible solution

(February 23-27^th +?+ March 8-9^th 2003)

Saddam Hussain did not want to destroy some rockets, because claiming to need them for the protection against USA during the war. That is not good. We have seen how keen USA is on attacking country by country, and destabilise the area. That is far worse. Saddam Hussain canged his mind about the rockets. That is good.

We should in each case stick to the demand of destroying the rockets. Of course, and we did. But that must also be followed up by a released and new politics by the UN, depending on Iraq being cooperative. Earth is a planet that runs a lot of its security thinking based on weapons. The synthesis could be a resolution that demands that Saddam destroys weapons, but also that UN guarantees the defence of Iraq, and also the opposite: defending the other countries against Iraq.

I do not think Saddam should be left alone with his people once again. I see a solution could be an independent Iraq, but that military and non military forces are present, with persons capable of observing and giving demands on Saddam, if not behaving well.

Keeping an elected man in that way, under observation, not dangerous, could become too difficult, keeping him away from suppressing his own people. But I think we should try it, closing us into him in that way, which could become the least dangerous, but also one of the most dangerous, if the Americans are too much present in those forces, with belonging agendas.

Also the dark forces may see synthesis in such directions, and may hijack the path, like they already have acted on their own. Their new hijackings may result worse.

Creating a new UN resolution, specific for Iraq, should perhaps include when a new election should be, with Saddam not for election. If a UN resolution are made general for removing all long sitting dictators on Earth, the the resolution should also include formulas that will not allow the Americans or other nations to act on their own. Earth have to judge case by case.

 

13. New kind of security thinking on Earth

This kind of pact and security; UN protecting a country from other contries, and opposite, will as a totality, and as times go on, lead to world security based on lesser weapons. In the Middle East area it seams that we have to start only with Iraq first, because I do not think the Israeli/American coalition will loosen on their kind of thinking yet, and the Israelis will not destroy or stop producing weapons in their own country.

It is up to rest of the world to choose a track where we can base our economic thinking on lesser weapons.

At the same time as guaranteeing the security of Iraq, the UN must loosen on some of the blockade. It is time to build up Iraq in positive ways, without destroying the country first.

 

14. The best ways of
    making unity?

World democracy must sometimes stand above democracy in one single country. But we have the situation that the people elected their leader. Saddam Hussain is not all to blame, because it is up to the people to create unity against evil and oppose negative leaders, no matter situation.

If they are not capable to unite, they must look into themselves, their own thoughts, there own feelings, their own thougt systems. If they are not capable of making unities, debates and positions in positive way, then perhaps there is something wrong about their way of thinking.

Therefore we seam to have to build up Iraq through those existing leaders, but were of course UN is the real leadership and the demanders. But Saddam Hussain will be given a great opportunity to act positive for his people.

We must always look on the people as the real leadership, and making them participate as soon as possible, in different ways, increasing positivity, by own positive participation.

We will fail some, and we will do some good stuff. It is also important to create positivity about the learning process.

I think the UN will fail more if the people look on themselves as the passive part and the UN as the active part.

 

15. The least dangerous experiment

I do not know the extent of this proposal. It is an experiment, which Earth still has not tried properly. But it will give us valuable experience. Of all the possible solutions, it seams to me to be the least dangerous, perhaps unless Saddam is putting a bullet in his own head, which also could become dangeorus. A Saddam Hussain that is cooperating fully in destrying weapons seams to be no solution, because the world, especially the Americans, will have difficulties believing it, no matter what. The inspections seams they have to be followed up, by more inspections, by more people, more observers, permanently. And throwing them out once again would mean war. Saddam is a man that have done a lot of terrible things.

We have experience from Afghanistan, where transforming to positivity with the existing leaders was a path not chosen. More diplomacy was not chosen, and now Afganistan may breaking up, separating to different groups, local war-lords, also resulting to American weapons against American weapons. Ref. Aftenposten March 6^th 2003, referring to www.janes.com.

We might from the elected path get to fight down some bad people. We do not have experience from turning them more positive in other ways, by for instance keeping the existing leadership. I do not think the world have become lesser dangerous with that chosen path (Afganistan). The American and Israeli way, acting on their own from their kind of thinking, will not lead to a lesser dangerous world.

 

16. A mulinational force
    is also an experiment

What if we choose a multinational force, attacking Iraq? –That would be an experiment too. Taking the leaders is not always the same as reducing hate and extremism. The attacking multinational forces could also be unnecessary provocative, and it would be a war solution, killing a lot of innocent people.

That do we have to take, if it shows up to be the final possible solution. We do not have to listen to the Americans to conclude when this is the final possible solution.

 

17. Keeping Saddam
    with or without
    lasting forces

Keeping Saddam as the leader seams to be a thought the world has to process a bit more. But being satisfied with the inspections, not getting more control-people into the country, permanently for years, is the same thing, probably worse.

I would not have made that solution; Saddam still being leader, without conferring the Muslim countries in that Area. If they want it, the world will be united about it, and the danger about the experiment would be reduced to a minimum.

Keeping Saddam without UN forces in Iraq could of course be evaluated, for a while, especially if USA, the most dangerous country, acts on their own. If they do that, and not willing to take directions from the UN, then I think the UN nations should start an eqonomic war against the USA/Israel-coalision. The UN nations have to define it own role, and find out what is extremely important for the future.

If the UN manages to handle this, with the Americans behaving well, then I think the UN must get something back from reducing the blockade. Peace-keeping military and non-millitary non violent forces; many people from the UN, is needed in Iraq.

 

18. Task for the
    Americans

If getting a force into Iraq peacefully, then the Americans would do best listening to communication and observe from space. But why should I trust the Americans? Why should I trust that the Americans not will reintroduce a negative path with false information and manipulations? Why should I trust that the Americans not will use frequency weapons? Why do I believe that the Israeli-American coalition is the most probable to try to assassinate Saddam, just to keep his mouth shut? – I am sorry dear Americans. I like you. I know there are a lot of positive forces inside your own country. But I do not trust certain forces inside your own country, those who are influencing your leadership, and now even are your leadership. I am trying, but I cannot, because of the Americans have fooled the world for decades. If I, a Norwegian, do not trust the Americans, then why should the Iraqis do?

We know that Saddam Hussain is a calculating man. But that is into the calculations, and he will not succeed with more evil. If he succeeds being as evil as the Americans from this very point, then he in fact could be very evil. I agree with those American ambassadors in Europe and in other countries who claim George W. Bush is far more dangerous than Saddam Hussain.

 

19. Saddams Opportunity

If Saddam would not take such an opportunity; still being leader, and getting a released UN politics, then he is nothing worth. He will not help his own people, and the world will start to believe that he is hiding things, which might be true. It is also a big possibility that he will not accept such a proposal, because of fearing that he will lose control over those who are protecting him. Then there seams to be no other alternative than a multinational force taking Iraq by military force.

Is the choice then between more people in or making war? – No there is not for certain that we need more people in, even if it is my opinion that such a demand could be the best, even getting non aggressive military forces into the country.

The world must not accept the Americans ruling Iraq, because of being hated, being provocateurs and being of too much hamburgers between their ears. The Americans should be kept away, unless finding people that the UN accepts.

If Saddam Hussain accepts the proposal, then a multinational force, also with a lot of non-military people, will just observe, and make some demands, but will not overthrow the leadership, unless the leadership is acting evil.

But it seams to me that we have to set a time-limit for how long Saddam Hussain can rule. His best security for the future, after stepping down from leadership, will be to act well. I do not think he ever will be a totally free man.

That we have to evaluate, for the best of the people of Iraq, what kind of process the UN wants to start. Their do still exist many contexts to be evaluated and debated. The Iraqis elected that man, and may have to take the future responsibility about that themselves.

We have to put him a place where he can be observed, but where he also can feel secure, in other words; a kind of prison.

Saddam will get the choice to create what kind of freedom he will create for himself. He can dream about the same freedom as past American evil leaders have managed to create for themselves, non confronted by the Americans, not put into prison.

 

20. The Court and
    debate way

The world would like to put him in court. The world will see with anger that UN protects him against all those people he has made suffer. Let us put him to court when that time comes. - But sadly enough, that is nearly impossible, because the Americans will not recognise that UN court / UN courts. They want to protect their own war-making. They want to protect Ariel Sharon, and they want to kill Saddam Hussain.

Saddam Hussain is really a scared man, behind his mask, even if he wanted to meet Bush in a debate. The Americans wants to kill a lot of people, destroy the infrastructure, create a lot of suffering, just to kill one man. Perhaps they are even more scared? – The world has to deal with two very scared sides. The one side has a lot muscles, protecting what is between the ears, not just for world security. The other has not, but can have hidden poisen and more.

The world must choose the court-way, even if the Americans are scared for what may come up. But in countries that are electing their evil leaders, and letting them participate in political parties, the situation is different. The world has to evaluate from time to time. Let us see when that time comes.

Saddam Hussain will with the above solution have every opportunity to play the nice guy for the world and become a Hero for many people. That means nothing to me, because without weapons he is not dangerous. Even if going to court, he could become a Hero. That is not dangerous either, even if the Americans would say so and fear it very much.

I think it would rather result to a give and take situation between the East and the West, where debates starts functioning, reducing extremism, inside USA, in Muslim countries, and in the rest of the world.

If the extreme Muslims too much make Saddam Hussain a Hero, it will tell a lot against them, like it will tell a lot about the Americans making Bush a Hero, made Osama Bin Laden a war-ally, made Saddam Hussain a war-ally, and is allowing Ariel Sharon to rule American thinking.

But if putting the diverse groups of Earth to observe the world court, I will trust debate and the increasing level of maturity inside every country.

 

21. Oil and enemies?

Now the world have become conscious on that there are underlying political goals behind the American Iraq war temper. Not in all of the Americans, but in dark forces of the Americans. Getting access to oil is one thing. Getting needed enemies is another thing, in their economical situation. The world have not yet become so conscious on the needed enemies.

Both in the Joguslavian war and in the war against Osama Bin Laden and Al Quida, there seemed to be something about the effort factor, or lack of such one, which goal seemed to be to test out the war itself and new weapons. But first of all the effort factor seems to want to preserve enemies.

Mr. USA Foreign Minister Colin Powell. I have to tell you: It could be very dangerous if such effort factors gets loose during the possible war in Iraq. I do not think that you are able to control all American / Isralian strategies away from it. I have also read the neither the Iraqis trust you to go directly for Saddam Hussain. I quess your plans for running an American government in Iraq may be to then make more focus on your "axis of evil".

Saddam Hussain was probably not caught during the golf war because certain forces wanted to use him later as an useful enemy, if necessary, or just as a between factor. But stopping that war that moment was also an event where some forces of light and some forces of darkness were of the same thought. It was difficult to see what was the right thing to do. I was about 22 years old, and observed the debate after those events. Perhaps we now understand that a leader who have capabilities to take a nation to war against another country would be best to take at once?

 

22. The present situation

Now the situation about Iraq is a bit different. Or is it? March 2th 2003 Mr. Blix found biochemical weapons buried. Now we have a leader that everybody knows try to fool the world. There is no chance to explain it as a mistake of some militaries. It has to be the responsibility of the leader.

What if USA goes to war from that situation, Saddam having a lot digged downunder the ground? Isn’t better to keep the pressure, and making him lesser dangeoru in that way?

What about George W. Bush? Is he not the most dangeorus war-maker here? Mr. Colin Powell, have someone in your country evaluated to remove him non violently? – I am sorry, from all the kind of information I have, USA needs a war from eqonomic and imperialistic reasons. I cannot see the big difference between USA and Irac. He is a president who have turned his people to go into a very unwise war.

Have you capabilities to create crises if you say that you will not be part of this any more? Would it be even worse if you goes away? Can the UN make a written statement for what kind of leadership we wish in the USA?

Would you be offended by that?

Mr. USA Foreign Minister Colin Powell. I have to tell you: These are the times where the world cannot afford that the forces of light becomes hijacked by the forces of darkness. I am warning you not to become the very gate for the forces of darkness to create the third world war. Saddam Hussain is not the only danger here. He is a real danger. But not the only one. We have to find the correct balance, not letting loose the dark forces on both sides.

 

23. Mr. Colin Powell

(February 7^th 2003?)

Mr. Colin Powell. You have your role to play. You are a clever demand putter, and works hard for the world to stand together for the demands.

Your biggest problem is that you are standing among war-rhetorics, provokers and those who wish a war no matter what.

Your country have stated that USA may act on its own if the UN are allowing Iraq to mislead and manipulate the inspectors. You see, we know that possibility. We have seen it. To show it for us, February 5^th 2003, was your duty. And that is what we are acting from now. You Americans have played your role to show it to the world. That’s good. But the world have also found out that your angles and views are a bit wrong. The world have found out that old Bush was part of a big lie about the Iraqi’ act in Quwait (killing new-born or something like that). We simply know, that when it is about war, there is a lot of propaganda going on, from both sides (March 9^th).

Our duty is to disarm Saddam Hussain, not to make war no matter what. Your duty next time is to share intelligence services, Promptly! not just expect the world to give intelligence services to you, which you are bossing over, to keep yourselves as the world security leaders. Your intelligence services was a card that should be played earlier. But now there is a very short time period from your speech in the UN February fitht to the new report from the inspector February 14^th, with very little time for the World to ajust opinions and acts. You are controlling the inspectioning process just as much as you are claiming the Iraqis to do. You are manipulating for your wished war. Do you not see that? Why are you part of this?

Addition februay 27^th 2003: Why is George W. Bush raising his voice against the occupation in Isreal and for the Palestinian state? Why say it now, and not before? Is it just to get lesser resistance before the war? Is it because of needing the voices for your created UN resolution in Iraq? Is it just to say it before Osama Bin Laden do it this time?

Do you not see that it could be a very dangerous manipulation going on, from your side?

 

24. The American World Manipulation, Mr. Colin Powell

Sadly enough, the World also have to evaluate what kind of manipulation that comes from you Americans. First of all, you hijacked the weapon report made by the Iraqis, and censured it. Then we cannot control how much Western forces have participated in creating the needed enemy.

You allow the Israeli terrorism.

You are influating the rate of interests all over the world, to milk nations in the very best way as you can. You get economic thinkers all around the world to think in the same ways as you do, probably a lot through secret societies.

Have your own CIA system tested out biological and chemical weapons on people on Earth, more than you ever can imagine? Is giving it to bad guys a way you use to test it out? Are your people so keen on DNA manipulated food just to create food and new microorganisms that our bodies and its microorganisms not are adapted to? – This last one could kill more people than Saddam Hussain ever are capable of, you know, even if he used mass destruction weapons all around the world.

You direct and keep things a secret all over the world; UFO’s, paraphysical and clean energy sources. Your secrecy kind of security thinking slow down political idea-making, and slow down Eartly evolution by decades.

 

25. 9/11

You knew about the 9/11 disaster on forhand, and propably played with, creating enemies, and hired Henry Kissinger to put a cover on that information, a man well known for putting nations against another. I understand that Kissinger now have withdrawn from his investigation, after disclosures, showing deep throuth to be a very dangerous player. Who investigates now? Do you not see that knowing about who knew about 9/11 could be very vital for the present situation? Do you not see that there could be a very dangerous world manipulation and playing situation here? Are there similarities between those who knew and those who wants war in the Middle East no matter what? Could it be very dangerous to give such people a war in the Middle East?

 

26. The white alibi

Do you not see that this could be their key situation? Ariel Sharon have the power. They have 9/11. They have George W. Bush. They have Saddam Hussain. They have convinced the Americans about an evil axis. They must act before their secrecy and playing are exposed for ever. And they have you, participating on convincing the world. They have you, more balanced than the others. A lot will fall for your demanding voice, seemingly a better American voice. They need you until the war have taken place.

You see, Mr. Colin Powell. My role is to tell the world the possibilities for that strong Kissinger types beyond stage have strong impact on American thinking and politics, creating enemies. Goerge W. Bush and his minister clan now seams to speak a lot of their power. They need You, Mr. Colin Powell, to be their very gate. They need you as an alibi.

What thoughts is in your head? What loyalty lives in your heart? Will you find your inner loyalty in better ways?

 

27. Darkest story ever?

I could fill a book on the American danger and manipulation, you know. In fact this book is filled up with it. It would not have been necessary for me at all to formulate Paraphysics and the politics in this book if the well hidden evil individuals in your own country did not have such power. In the Chapter "Letter to the Americans" I warned you Americans not to lead the crocks to the World. It seams now to be exactly what your are doing.

If using some of the material you showed in the UN, to make Saddam kneel, it could become a beautiful story, depending on Saddam to give what the UN wants, and the UN to disarm him peacefully. Then the USA-Israelian dark forces will more and more go lack of needed enemies. I do not think the Americans want to go lack of enemies too soon if the UN concludes it wise to disarm Saddam by war-making.

The Americans wants war no matter what. Do you not see that, and the danger in it, Mr. Colin Powell? Why are you playing with them in that way?

If playing the game to let loose the dark forces on both sides, it could become the darkest story of history. The guilt is more yours (the Americans) than the other side, even if we often can find more suppression on the other side.

(February 6^th ?)

28. Where darkness
    infiltrates

Watching religiosity and suppression on both sides, the lower kind of spirit is equally amonted, just different. I would say the American-Israelian lower spirit is the most dangerous one. The darkness of The Eastern side is more obvious to us, perhaps because of being different religious. From the Eastern side the Western form of darkness becomes very obvious.

(February 27^th)

Birgit Klein in "I am the way, the truth, and life", page 45, writes: "It is in the outer manifestation of the religious life that darkness kan infiltrate. Anybody can sacrifice an animal, whoever can go to a religious feast and look holy. But Gods will lies in the in the ordinary secular life, as a demand for pretty usual humanity, love and helpfulness."

On the western side have the manipulation forces understood they will achieve more by hiding and playing the white forces. Lack of detecting that manipulation is the most dangerous. It is even more difficult to detect it when chief structures of it is existing in secret societies.

Why are the Sirians a part of this darkest game? nearly seaming to be one of its cause? – I will tell you. But first I ask: Is Colin Powell a Sirian?

 

29. Colin Powell;
    – a Sirian project?

Some days before sending you - Mr. Colin Powell - the chapter-trio "Zionist-Annuaki Imperialism", "Economic war against the USA" and "Letter to the Americans", I had this strange dream. It was you stepping into my dream, strictly demanding me to hurry up and send you what I was writing on. I did not take it seriously, but worked hard anyway, because the times needed it. I sent you the merchandise some days later, late on april 7. 2002, Norwegian time, to your State Department Email address, and also to other addresses in the world. It failed to come to George W. Bush’ email (his staff).

I do not know if anybody takes of their time to read my stuff though, but I am participating in the best way as I know and can.

I do not know what that dream was, if it was something from my own consciousness, if it was a vawe-packet I was picking up in the ether or if someone was sending me the stuff. But it gradually got me the idea that you might be a Sirian project, as Jesus probably was as well. Someone from a New Age environment claimed you in year 1999 or 2000 to be an alien project, probably after reading some stuff. I have observed your acts, your behaviour, and it seams to me that you are a soul from the spiritual hierarchical political tradition, where the ways to put the demands and how to unite seams to be a common structure of the thought system itself. I have not placed you to that position before pretty resently, and my dream was to great help for that. I do of course not know if I am correct about it.

You are probably a Sirian project, but are probably mostly left on your own, judging for yourself. You are not constantly taking "orders", but have to feel on, use logics, evaluate and improve, as normal growing individuals.

 

30. Frequency weapons
    as Mind Control

As I stated in the chapter "Atomic weapons, frequency weapons and consciousness", the Americans made use of frequency weapons in Kosovo, resulting to the many canser instances. The canser was not made of impoverished uranium. Now the Americans have stated they may use frequency weapons in Iraq, to ruin electronic circuits. And more I guess.

Using frequency weapons in Kosovo, in that "light" form, was I given a inner beep on. I am not telling you to belive me, but I believe it myself. I suspected it, but did not dare to believe in it. I suspected it again, and got a beep on it, as a beep to my thinking. (Ref. chapter "Atomic weapons, frequency weapons and consciousness"). The beep on "planting nuclear boms" was something I did not suspect on forehand.

I do not know if I ruin for myself by telling about my inner friends. I just want to be honest, not use it as a power-statement, where I cannot find other references. If some readers gets lesser beliefs in me because of telling about that source, that is good, because I do not want to convince you, especially not in wrong terms. That is for your own judgment. I am presenting my truths, naked for you.

 

31. American-Zionst
    Imperialism:
    -Gate of Antichrist

Even if keeping UFO’s and paraphysical technology a secret for 50-80 years. Even if by that making the environment crises. Even if the Americans by their secrecy and economic thinking have created more cruelty than the second world war. Even all this, the hidden American backplayers / Zionists will now play the Hero role, continuing to be the world boss.

Ref. chapter "Zionist-Annuaki Imperialsm" for seeing what seems to be the real agenda and imperialism behind the dark forces on Earth. I have continued these views in this chapter, but you may be read them independently of that chapter.

Americans, Zionists and Annuakis are speaking about enemies, where the Annuakies, from planet Niburu, seems to be the top structure, which other determined dark forces in the Universe of the same negativity also could channelling there agendas through. It would be natural to try to hijack the chief structure of a planet.

Other claim the Illiminatus to be the top structure. They have I lesser knowledge about.

But different negative agendas may be runned in different ways, not all throught the chief structure, but through factors that may become a chief structure.

If their comes a dark leader, it seams to me he will come throught the existing chief structure. Not throught other terrorists. The galactic imperialist could of course run a lot of their agendas through terrorists, but they will be seated in the chief structures. They will never run their agendas fully throught terrorist, that even not are capable to unite in hierarchical structures, even if they are bearing hierarchical religious minds, which is very anti-hierarchical to other hierarchies.

They will run their agendas throught those with weapons, technology, and chief minds of world security, hijacking them, telling about space alien dangers, to come as protectors, to a planet of fallen soul. To do that they simply have to infiltrate and be seated where the real power is. And they have to lower the spiritual rising of the planet, because that is their only way to not be exposed.

 

32. The Americans and the Zionists are themselves channelling the Alien danger

Dear reader, I am arguing from speculations here, what I feel. But when the Americans are speaking of the alien danger, I ask you to read their words inwords, and read the hearts of the individuals the words are coming from. Nearly all their words seams to me to be projections of themselves.

Read also the hearts of the spokespersons. From what (common) heart do their voices come from?

Who are the Annuakies? How can they influence? How can some of the hearts of people of Earth be the hearts of Annuakies? – By incarnations and channelling negativity.

(Ref. for instance chapter "Nibiru, the twelwth planet" to learn more about the Annuakies / Nibiruans.)

There is a lot of quotations from top politicians, American politics, telling about Alien danger. (ref. for instance div. presidents. The presidents are not of the most informed, but some were necessarily convinced). Space-aliens seams to be the next needed enemies after Bush’ evil axis, an axis that might need a third world war through decades if ones goal is to fight evil down in that way (which rather is to create evil). If starting with Iraq, successfully, then American aggression and manipulation will be hard to stop, taking country by country, not rising the hearts of Earthlings, not getting rid of limited politics, but war-ifying it, with belonging emotions.

The real Alien danger needs Earth to look on the Universe with the eyes of Alien danger. That is the path those Aliens need to be able to infiltrate, operating as infiltrators, acting protectors. World Security is religion, and when expressing it, it becomes a battle about truths, infiltrating world security thinking.

American world security religion is gradually served to the public. The religion needs a state of lower emotions on Earth, and a great war, to win the hearts of Earthlings, focusing on the Universe with the eyes of enemyship.

If exposing their religion too early, it would from the raised human heart have been exposed as dangerous religion.

The Annuakies and their equal low thinkers in the universe would not choose Saddam Hussain or someone like him to conquer Earth. To conquer Earth, gradually, and use it as a war planet base (ref. chaper "Channeling from Semjase"), one have to play all around the planet, but be seated where the real power is. A lot could be caused by hamburgers between the ears of the Americans. But a lot could also be caused by hidden influence. From where? How?

 

33. Hearts

For introducing that path of Earth, we seam to have a long history about it: Incarnations. Souls with memory in feelings from before Earth-life.

Some people, sitting in powerful positions in USA and in most countries, could bear the Annuaki/Niberian hearts, or bear hearts just easy to influence. Other people have found more of their immanent love. But they could be part of a negative agenda without knowing it, and they could not.

There could be many people bearing different hearts, from other places in the universe. I have observed what is thought to be a Sirian heart, other than that of Colin Powell. Colin Powells heart have I not observed closely. It is just a guess.

I have observed the hearts of more limited spiritual hierarchists. I have observed structures, paths, and possibilities. I have observed the Zionists from distance. I do not think Ariel Sharon is representative for all of them, but he represents a path. Most Jews are of good hearts, but can be hijacked. I have not been close enough to a Jew to make conlusions for myself, for the common.

I saw a TV-program on NRK March 8^th 2003. It was about purification of Jewish women. I do now see that the male dominant ribbi religion, and elder of Zion Zionism, is not at all better than the religious regime in Iran. I see that Zionist Imperialism may be even more dangerous, with great power in many countries, capable of creating eyes of enemyship on others.

Dear Jews, plese help me so that the future somehow will regard Hitler to be wrong. I know you can. You have showed that to the world. But did you show it in correct ways.

I see more and more equality between the Annuaki agenda and the jewish heart.

Please help me to see I am not correct. Confront. But confront also yourselves. I know you can. I saw the hearts of those women was hurted. Your religion was created for the man to make it easy for him. Your religion was created for hierarchy and dangerous loyality.

Your new religion should be your own heart, where Earth is a free place for everybody, not just for serving the man.

I see that jewish women can be easy to love for a man. But for youself; it is more love in your own freedom. That freedom you can create more of, when being single or in marriage.

Some of the Norwegian women are on the other side too demanding, too hierarchical, and the Norwegian man have to realise that a lot of feminism are channelled through the male heart. We are going to discover male feminism, not being feminine, but discover male feminism. The Norwegian man is going to free himself. He will find the strength in his own heart, as the highest freedom, see that in the women too, and joyful agree with women chosing from their own will, from joy of their hearts.

Anger and violence belongs to the more limited hearts, not bearing the inner strength, which needs to suppress women to feel a false strength.

The man needing to free himself from women is not the case for most of Earth, where women have to free themselves, and participate, in home, in the society and in politics, as equal participators, in number of individuals and ways of thinking. Sometimes there is needed more women than men. Sometimes that results to masculine (spiritual) hierarchies too, which also the matriarchate may turn to. But first of all, freeing the women means the rise of feminism on Earth.

All Judes are different, as everybody else. But I have observed religion. I have observed dereligionising of Jewism. I have observed there exists many religious directions of Jewism, but it all turns up in the same picture; Ariel Sharon. It is the picture of looking down to Earth from a space-shuttle, with a big slash on the wing. He was speaking to Ariel Sharon.

I am a provoker.

We can all be hijacked in some way. Some spiritual hierarchist are of pretty equal hearts as the Zionists, I can tell from observing religion. But they are opponents, or is running the same race, in some sence, from the structure of their consciousness. Some non-Zionists seams also to be of a Nibiruan or Annuaki-like heart.

There is no need to hate. I just want the reader to observe. Earth need your observation for positive paths.

My observations might be wrong. All is relative. If everyone turned to my observations, it would be dangerous. Listen only to yourself. Your innermost heart is the highest authorithy. Do not listen to my speculations. The choice for how to focus is yours. Observation is a common purpose. But you are the closest being to yourself.

 

34. The Zionist-Annuakies needs the antichristing of the USA

How will the Americans react if the 4^th largest weapon-power on Earth starts to act evil on its own? – The Annuakis needs the antichristing of the USA, to play the World Game, but may sooner or later somehow put the USA out, perhaps to make USA loyal.

Terrorist are for the Annuakies, the Zionists and the Americans a welcome thing, for those negative individuals among them that controls the game. But the bomb may have been blown by the Zionists. The Americans are manipulators and manipulated.

 

35. The Zionists wan the second world war

Hitler lost his war, which is good. The world would have turned more evil, even after Hitlers death, because of the hierarchical structure, which always leads to power-sickness and manipulation. Especially in the lower hierarchies.

But do not forget that the Zionist was among the winning countries as well, and had every opportunity to increase their world manipulation. They did.

That is my view. I am not hating. I am just observing. I am observing, but I tell it also to provoke, to see if there will come necessary anti-reactions. Perhaps most anti-reactions are best without turning them back towards me?

 

36. Who startet
    antisemittism?

Hitler was not the one that started antisemittism. Wide forces of the people themselves felt the oppressing power beyond the Jews, and a provocative thought structure that collectively may lead to world manipulation and evil. Was it more than just the pople of Hitler needing someone to focus all their negativity on? Was it more than just Cristians wanting the Jews to convert to Jesus? Was it more than Jews looking down on others? Was it Jehova-faith and the Jews believing they were the chosen people of God? Is the thing about "the chosen people" and Hitlers "Aryan race" one and the same thing? Could the Jewish attitude to being the chose people be provocative? Did you create Hitler, the opposite, your mirror?

I do not know. I Just know you have elected Ariel Sharon, who looks down on and hate others. Was Judaism and Jews unnecessary provocative before Hitler also?

Am I provocative against you Jews in a way that is needed? Shall I separate Jewism and Zionism in my criticism? Is Israel-lobby another word for the same, or is that something different?

Because of Hitler, we now knows how to not fight down the world manipulators and oppressors, if there is Zionists among them. The people of Earth exaggerated, mostly the Germains, but may now, February 8^th 2003 do the very opposite. The pointing finger against anti-Semitism, claiming all to be anti-Semitism, is used to gain power, very manipulative power.

 

37. Freeing themselves from critism

Zionists claim everything unwanted to be anti-semitism, and made themselves free from critism. As soon as someone criticise, they comes with hard accusations back. They made people afraid to criticise. It became a too heavy stuff for people, afraid to be compared to something they did not want to.

Is that good? Did we make a country, a people, free from critism too much? Could it be dangerous to fear to much to go into that heavy stuff?

 

38. An advice to
    the Israelis and
    to the World

I may be wrong about the innermost Zionists. But that depends on the Americans and Ariel Sharon playing nice guys, not manipulative "nice-guys", which is a disguise. But if playing the nice guys, and a bomb are blown off, for example in the USA, my first guess would be the Zionist-Annuaki Imperialism, not a Muslim terrorist. If a Muslim do it, it could be the same as killing millions of his own people. If a Zionist do it, it is agenda, but which may lead to the last battle of the third world war in Israel.

No matter what happens, I do not think it is wise to start a hate campaign against the every day Jew or those who look positively on an Israeli state. I admit that the Israel state could become one of the most dangerous projects of history. But it does not have to.

I have to admit the danger about the Israel-project. But I am not against it. I see no other alternative. The Israelis must themselves show that their self-deportations do not lead to more of the evil they now are creating.

I want all those positive Jews and Israelis out on the streets, marching for peace, and telling Ariel Sharon to turn the other cheek on. Tell him that this is the only way of starting the stopping of terrorism. Tell the man he has to be humble. Be many and strong about that. If you are not strong enough, even more of your brothers and sisters will be killed. Be strong against him over long time, because he will try to be evil behind your backs. Be strong against him, and try to make him a Hero for Peace, positively created.

You may turn him helpful for the people of Earth, but watch him even then, because in that sphere his power may grow bigger and more dangerous than ever.

If not watching him, we can get biblical sceneries (Christians) which ends up killing most of the Israelis, where the chief Annuakies just seek other power-positions on Earth, where they already are seated. You are just a point on the map. Antichrist forces may just as well be among the socalled Rockefellers, Rothchilds or Illiminatus.

You find information about those on the Internet. They do not belong to my area of competence. The most important is the positivity and love in the human heart, which will give negative agendas lesser power.

 

39. Earn my trust

I will be watching you. If creating peace in Israel and going for combinations of help and war in other countries in your area, or just help, I will still not trust you compleately. Overruling the Oslo-agreement showed that you are not to be trusted. You have to earn my trust.

I will never tell you if you have earned my trust, nearly compleately, passing these times without the third world war. You have my trust, and you have not.

 

40. Security by not separating the Palestines and the Israelis

If continuing your war-making, then erasing Israel is what other negative forces in the Middle East may want to do, with a terrible terrorist act. This may probably cause against actions that kills a lot of terrorist’s own people, and actions just in the blind.

Putting up that kind of game could in fact be done by the worst Zionists, Antrichrist and the Annuakies. Are they capable of going against themselves to get it as they want? Are they viewing things in number of lives against even more number of lifes, in their views, and therefore killing the fewer number of lives?

For the Annuakies, you know, it is about preservation of a whole planet; planet Nibiru. They are capable of making terrorist acts in Israel, turning your hearts the way they want.

The worst scenarios could be fulfilled by a bad leader. Therefore you have to make sure to not elect bad leaders. You did not elect Ariel Sharon directly. Therefore you have to evaluate your democratic system. The Norwegians do also have to evaluate that, electing the government more directly. But I do not think Norwegian politicians trust their own people enough for that. It seams that also the Norwegians have to wait a while for being able to elect more directly, for politicians and in cases, other than gallup measurements.

Your best security is to not elect bad leaders in your own country. Security against a huge Muslim terrorist act, is to not separate the Israelis and the Palestines to much, but living in each other countries. A huge terrorist act from other Middle Eastern negative individuals will then be lesser probable, and the world will get a clearer watch directly on Antichrist, if he is playing the cruel game.

 

41. Security by integration

Security is integrating and loving each other.

Security is getting rid of negativity on both sides. Do you then think that security is to get rid of individuals? – I would rather say that getting rid of negativity is development of hearts in each individual on both sides.

But your leader do not want that. He is the one that creates the biggest danger for you.

Security by integration will start to increase after Israel have turned the other cheek on, when Israel is more humble and thinks differently.

Separate nations for the Palestines and the Israelis is good, but you have to find each other, no matter what.

 

42. The World will see you

If you as one of the jewish people are accepting stealing more land, you will very much participate in creating the gate of Antichrist spiritual forces, and the World will finally have to make a judgment about Zionism, and use you as a symbol of what World Zionism really is. You will be used as a symbol of what the Zionist attitude for the World and its inhabitants really is. It could be used as a symbol on what Jewism is. The world have to evaluate if too many Zionists in leading positions is good for the world. And the world will evaluate if a people that is closing its eyes for the suppression of the Palestines, and welcomes the stealing of land, is just as much guilty as Antichrist himself.

My guess is that the Israelis themselves killed some of their own after the Isreali cruelty in Jenin, just to lead the angry eyes of the world away from yourself. I did never hear anything more about the Palestine man who was claimed to be dressed in Israeli military clothes, who went to several plases to just shoot down Israelis. I did not see any bodies either.

Was that man an Israelian, in a key situation of time, where the pointing finger of Earth could have changed the negative path of Israel? Question: Do you think your leaders are capable of arranging such things, just to manipulate the world? – I do not think you should leave out such possibilities, generally speaking. I have no information about it myself, but will not leave out such possibilities, generally speaking. That up to the observation capabilities and judgement of Earth.

The world will see you no matter what. The world is already seeing very clear that the terrorist acts of your leaders just creates more terrorism against you. The world already see very clear a people that partly of free will, partly manipulated, agrees to generate more cruelty.

What will you do about that? Do you want to do anything about it? Is closing your eyes and doing nothing a way to agree with the path? Have you created religious hierarchy and hierarchy too much, so that you fear to to protest against your leader? A couple of years ago I saw in a newspaper an Israeli woman protesting. She was bearing a cloth before her face, scared to be recognised. Is that common? If it is, - how is this different than the fear Saddam Hussain is creating?

 

43. Christ versus
    Antichrist

You are hungering to tell the world about your fear living under the threat of terrorism. You are hungering for the world to be on your side.

You are hungering for the World to be on the side of antichristing forces. Christ is not a man, but a name of a spirit, or a title of those people channelling that spirit, that energy of love. Antichrist is the opposite spirit, a spirit of separation and warfare, a spirit of more distance between the dualistic poles, poles not integrated in the same individual. In the antichristing inner forces the individuals are taking position in one of the many poles, poles of positions, poles of relativities, not capable bearing many of them inside the mind at the same time. Therefore enemies are created.

I am not saing that it is wrong to take position. But you see my point here.

Christ is the spiritualising spirit, for unity inside and beyond the physical. The spirit of Christ is higher energies from beyond, which people of today may canalize down to their inner and outer bodies, down to physical Earth. Antichrist is the opposite spirit, but a lower spirit, that opposes to the spirit of Christ.

The starting of the Christening of Earth was seated in one person. Somebody says several persons, which also may be correct. I believe that the Antichrist spirit may be "chiefed up" in one person as well, the very symbol, and I am guessing that man to be Ariel Sharon, if we allow him.

I am not telling you to belive in Jesus or to become religious in one or another way of the Christian ways, as the Christian Jews. I am just telling you to not oppose a good spirit, no matter what name you put on it and no matter who it comes from.

Good spirits do also come from your neighbours in the Middle East.

 

44. Talking to a wall?

I think I in some degree are talking to the wall here, not capable of making myself understood. Do I talk to a wall? Why are you talking to walls? – Do you just want to hear echoes of you own voices, and nothing else? Are you talking rabbish?

I am having very fun by provoking, haven’t I?

 

45. The Americans

The Israelis will not identify with my views or accusations, in the same ways as the Americans will neither. I saw a Muslim on BBC February 7^th 2003 who did put his position about the Americans quite well. He said the Americans are a hard working people, many with 2 and 3 jobs, trying the best that they can to survive, and do not understand why they are the most hatet people in the world.

He putted it well. I am not hating Americans, but he putted it well, even if he had some fanatism inside himself also.

They Americans are propably satisfied with working all days for their living, since they are not opposing their government because of having to work so much for their living. But why support warfare no matter what happens, supporting their leaders, seemingly just to feel the American greatness in their hearts. Does that belong in the great heart? Do the American manipulation of secret forces belong in their hearts? Do the false hierarchical unities and kind of loyalty belong in their hearts?

The Americans do not want to go to war without the united world, status February 2003. That is good. I will kiss them for that. Then they only have some dangerous leaders left. Do they? What if not willing and capable of changing the path of the leaders?

It can be difficult to see on the American acts and front men discussions that there have been a long plan for preserving the enemies, to soon play the Hero role, getting the chief introduction for paraphysical technologies during a big scale war, and therafter transforming the enemy picture into the universe.

But if observing George W. Bush and some of his people, Earth has now the opportunity to observe the will of the behind stage people and strong forces. Bush, Rumsfeld and Cheney speaks their retorics and necessity for enemies. Bush could have turned different without those two other guys. Perhaps that could be true? We saw Bush with one ear to Colin Powell and one ear to the Hawks, didn’t we? I do not know who others are in that lobby.

Then the white forces on Earth have to avoid that the possible Iraq war becomes the very gate for the ultimate rise of Antikrist. It may not start at once, but the continued thought-structure of the American leaders these days generates greate possibilities for it. Unecessary provocations at war may also generate it. It may have the same effect as fireworks on stage.

 

46. The beginning and the end of third world war

A third world war starts up, with USA’s secret paraphysical technology, frequency weapons, and some "men in black" capabillities, among other things. Forces and against forces will then spread epidemic. The situation in Israel today may just a little miniature on what will develop further. The most probable end of this war, this epidemy, may be a final great battle over Israel. A nostradamic scenario may rise, with 200 million Chinese, Indians or/and Japanese marching west, perhaps a neutral people in this connection, that secures peace and the battling cocks away from each other.

This would mean the end of Israel, and the Israel-USA coalistion that we knows today, but not enough if the white skinned dark suppressing forces not are exposed during the process of a third world war.

Time will show if Earth gets a Bushian retorics in direction of an outer space alien enemy picture. Perhaps this manipulative retorics will be rised above the Bush-level, and therefore still dangerous direction-giving.

Opposite will not naivism against the universe rule, but far more balanced angles of view and acts will rule.

Some prediction claims there will be a lesser war after the third world war, some decades after, if I remember correctly. That could perhaps start because the views still not is enough balanced, more directed against the dark players, more exposed.

We may avoid both these wars, but it does not seam so for the moment, status January + March 9^th 2003.

 

47. After the third
    world war

After those wars, the Era that Hitler belived would start from him, will finally start fully, if we belive the predictions. I do. The choise is ours. We may start now, if we are able to rise spirit and confront more directly, not lowering our hearts when confronting.

Love all.

Love all. You do not have to confront if you do not want to. That choice of yours is necessary for integration. That may be necessary for learning. Learning could also be best for you being alone for a while. All is relative. Feel. Use logics. What is that feeling of mine? Can I choose it away? Can I throw away garbage in from my own mind?

How can I create bridges between different parts of my mind?

How can different kinds of thinking on different parts of Earth find each other, rather than that one shall win over all the rest?

Even if people today in great parts of Earth do not not like communism, one will focus on the yellow Great Power in the East, and how it avoided the madness of a third world war, and not being influenced by the manipulations and forms of hierarchy in the West and the Middle East, even if one sees the manipulations and suppression among the Chineese too. But people will probably focus more on the sentrikuleian human and political ways of thinking, in rised variants, where differences between people are recognised, after capabilities and effort, more than communism do, but where noone shall suffer, and where noone shall be short of opportunities.

People will probably also focus on the God picture itself, because common for the battlers of the third world war is the masquline personal God. The God has a common origin.

 

48. The direction
    of Earth?

The direction of Earth is decided these days, if it will be a third world war, which is a track that we can chose away or reintroduce in different ways in the years to come.

The choices that is done will decide what kind of contacts our planet will get with outer space and parallel dimensions. Equals attracts equals. Opposites attracts opposites.

Earth is a popular place. Earth is a place where many races in space have history.

We may ourselves decide who we are going to have most contact with, for the development of Earth. We may decide from our own negativity or our own positivity.

If it is the third world war we elects as a track, then there is still possibilities to positivise ourselves, the directions and the contacts.

Higher devellopped races will not try to convince. That is the responsibility of the individual. Higher races will only provide for preparations, if they are sensing a wish for it, or finds it wise to make a higher coice opportunity available for the lower developed race.

Other races have perhaps come a bit longer than us, in positive direction, which we probably will wish to have some contact with, for the cause of the contact and to develop further.

Other planets are in evolutionary phases that needs observation and supervision, and hidden or open help, in phases that Earth until now have been in. I understand from diverse literature that there exists a galactic plan for Earth to take part in the development of such planets.

 

49. Speculations on
    history after Atlantis

A lot of races are claimed to have operated on Earth. Most people of today are probably also incarnated from diverse planets and dimensjons in the universe, regarded to be from many political traditions of souls. But most Earthlings are also regarded to be from the Earth-school, incarnated here many times.

The Sirian tradition on Earth seams to be far older than Atlantis, or far older than the fall of Atlantis. (Ref. various litterature and archaeological findings.)

Plato’s source on the history about Atlantis was from the ancient Egyptian tradition. Atlantis, first of all the name of a great continent in the Atlantic ocean, sank into the ocean about 12000 years ago.

Sourses from litterature claims that after the great war resulting to a chatastrophe on Atlantis, it existed an atmosphere of eden and naivity on Earth. We are perhaps speaking about 2-4 thousends years later.

Earth was in a new phase, where evolution of men and society had to start all over again.

In such a phase Earth would be open for galactic imperialist to take over, probably by incarnations - if there was other galactic plans for the planet, and if the galactic imperialists wanted to use the individuals for their purposes on that planet. Ref. info about the Nibiruans in "The Pleiadian Agenda" by Barbara Hand Clow. (Nibiru is not a Pleiadian planet, which the Nibiruans claims themselves in various internet sites, trying to gain power. But the Annuakies are the last remains of fallen souls from the Pleiads. On the Pleiads have "eternal peace" existed for over 50.000 years. About the Pleiads: ref. also Rune Øver Øverby’s book "Jordens fjernhistorie i et nytt lys", who refers to the Billy Meier – Semjase-contact.) My rembemering of these sources could be a bit mixed.

In such a phase it would be natural to have the Sirians, spiritual hierachists, as guard dogs on Earth. They were probably seated in Egypt, perhaps also on other places on Earth, which leaded to the Egyptian religion, in a time where they in fact was gods, far more developped than the new phase of evolving humans on Earth.

There may have been some remains of technology from Atlantis, or technology introduced from others, that humans on that evolutionary state was regarded not to be mature enough for. Earth had earlier failed combining spiritual maturness and technology, and was regarded to still not be mature for higher technologies for many thousands of years to come.

 

50. Introducing
    monotheism

It came to a certain phase, a time of transition, where the Eartlings had to be left for their own. The Sirians had failed some, but had done good work as well. But first of all, it came to a new state of evolution, a time of transition. Earthlings wanted to rule for their own. The Sirians had to leave the stage.

Leaving the Earthlings for themself also ment to remove the religion, a removal not all agreed on in that time. Akhnaton may have been a Sirian project. Akhnaton introduced monotheism, the belief in just one personal God. The Earthlings was regarded to still not be mature enough to carry inner thruths and belonging responsibility, and needed a God that not existed an Earthly picture on, or personalised in some ways. The Sun became a great symbol.

 

51. Hijacking monotheism

After Akhnaton, and the Sirians leaving the stage, the stage became more open for the Nibiruans to gradually take more control. As being strong hierarchical themselves, but far lower developed, monotheism fitted into their system of thinking. They hijacked Akhnatons God, and did probably also decorate on history and historical events. The old testament, the Tora, may in some degree be incorrect about the description of the Jews travelling from Egypt.

Today we find speculations that Akhnaton and Moses was close beings in time, and that Moses went to Akhnatons school.

We even find the theory that Moses in fact was Akhnaton. That theory seems to me to come from an Nibiruan soul her on Earth. Making Akhnaton and Moses one and the same individual could make the Nibiruans increase their power on Earth, because now also claiming ownership of the wast Egyptian history.

Today it seams to be a great battle around the history about Akhnaton. Some researches call it science, when presenting their ideas, but it seams to me that it is highly open for you and me as well to take part in the speculations.

 

52. Giving God back
    to the Earthlings

The Nibiruans had taken power over the personal God, and the God had become pretty judging, as it necessarily will develop to in strong masculine hierarchies.

Jesus did incarnate in the time where the Nibiruans had plans to take total control over Earth, and would finally regard Earth as their property, which they in some sence already did and still do. (Ref. Barbara Hand Clow about wanting to take fully control over Earth in the times of Jesus.) (I cannot understand how they could conquer Earth that time. It had to be througth infiltrating the Romans, did it not? Like trought the Americans today, via Zionists and others?)

Jesus transmuted wine into blood; crystalline codes of higher dimensions that made the Earthlings lesser capable to be manipulated. That made the Nibiruan imperialism on Earth to fail, preliminary, but may these times, 2000 years later, manage to increase their soul of Earth, in a decisice effort through human bodies, making their way open.

Jesus was probably in some sence a Sirian coming back to Earth to do some repair of the Sirian earlier acts on Earth.

For Jesus God is Love, and that have the monotheistic religions in some degree adopted. He probably replaced himself as a between stage to God, or did little to avoid that, because that could make it lesser probable for the dark forces to hijack the new introduced views.

 

53. Hijacking Jesus

It may also have been people after the incarnation of Jesus that placed Jesus as an between stage for God, and themselves as a between stage for both God, Jesus and forgiving of sins.

In an Aramaic gospel found by G. J. Ouseley, Jesus names God for Abba Amma, which means Mother-Father or Father-Mother. That seams to have been removed from the religious traditions on Earth, in the same way as reincarnation was. That gospel includes reincarnation.

Now we seams to have come to a point were we either have to choose between the spirit of Christ or the spirit of Antichrist. The Nibiruans wants Earth, first of all channelled through the Zionists and the Americans, but where some limited minds of some Muslims also are welcome.

 

54. Hijacking the Sirian thought-system

Since the Sirians are of the spiritual hierarchical tradition, they seems to me to very much focus on the ways to God going through higher developed individuals. That view can be exaggerated.

Hierarchies of that sort may be systems of demands, which is common for the Sirians and the lesser developed Nibiruans. But it comes to a phase where the demands of the Nibiruans and the demands of the Sirians are difficult to see the difference of, even if their agendas can be quite different, and one of them is of a darker purpose.

The Nibiruans are playing the light, and the Sirians thinks they are the light - putting the demands for the light. The mixing, fooling the Sirians and the World, is a necessary gate for the rice of Antichrist.

Forces of light and forces of darkness are today pretty much mixed together in secret societys, a long strategy through ages by the dark forces, today able to manipulate and run the game. The voices of demands and the voices of seemingly light on Earth are not hiearchising to the highest God, but are diversions.

 

55. Exaggerating Atlantis

The Sirians are today exaggerating the story about Atlantis. The Sirians are exaggerating their own thought structure.

Avoiding the failure of Atlantis to happen again, the Sirians have run a game in demand of non insight. Then the game became open for darker forces behind stage, also playing the game in the demand of non insight.

At the end of chapter "Paraphysical Technology on Earth?" I was claiming that the forces of light and the forces of darkness was running the same run in the demand of non-insight. That was probably what leaded to the "Channeling from Semjase", channelled through Tore Alfstad.

I will still keep my view on that, and direct it to the Sirians, telling them that the monkies already have dangerous weapons, provoking for a full scale war, now intendning to them use them in a full scale war, playing the Hero role, while the rest of Earth not have gained insight into UFO secrecy and more, and therefore neither on democracy.

Are the Sirians kind of Heroers too? finding their ways upwards and look downwards in the spiritual hiercichal system, for others to see them?

Then the Sirians may have played their role a bit dark here. Earth was supposed to expose the darkness and the dark forces.

 

56. Questions to
    the Sirians

I was admitting that the Earthlings should have exposed darkness, and was asking what was the situation on Earth when we yet have not done it?

Now I am asking: What if a controlling force of light are part of controlling the game and denies us from insight helpful to expose darkness? Perhaps the insight even are necessary to expose darkness? Shall even the forces of light hijack the Sirians? to be able to remove dangerous demands of non-insight?

You are talking about Earth to gain experience, growing to become a mature planet. Do we have to go through a third world war to get that insight? What if the Sirians are playing the game leading us to the third world war?

Do you want us to go through a third world war just to ensure that the forces of darkness finally playes out their role, and becomes exposed quicker than they otherwise would have done? Do you want a thirld world war now, expressing itself, before the dark forces gets even more dangerous in a planetary and outer planetary scale? I t it so that you arew not thinking in that way, but that you thinking in that way anyway.

If leading us to a third world war: -Are you planning to participate and repair your created damages if the war goes in the wrong direction and Earth seams to be in the hand of darker forces? Are the Earthlings all to be blaimed if we are not capable of avoiding galactic imperialists to take over?

If you see your participating role, as a dangerous secret-keeper: -Why not expose and fight down the antichristing forces of darkness already now in stead of waiting for a Western-Muslim war? Do you want the West and the Muslims to cruch together, just to increase the possibility that limited consciousness on both sides in our time are exposed and defeated?

Answers from the Sirians


Received March 18 in 2003
VKN-78B51KZ-82A-ZBUN-SIRIUS1
-----------------------------
Message to Tor Opdahl from representative 37Zku95c Velnloch representing the Sirius Hierarchy.
The Sirius Hierarchy consist of a multidimensional federation of several civilizations within the Sirius system. The Sirius alliance is ruled after a pyramided type of hierarchy with the person with greatest spiritual delvelopment at the top. In addition to this there also is a council consisting of 12 members who are unhierachic orginazed. The Sirius alliance has incarationfiltering who enables selection to the souls who want to incarante within the alliance. The Sirius alliance are an important part of the galactic confederation. The Pleiades is also members of this galactic confederation. The galactic