Olav Versto er redaktør og sjefssynser i landets største avis. Versto er en historietenker og pidestallifiserer. Når andre mennesker er travelt opptatt med å skjøtte sin 8-4 jobb, så har Versto et hav av tid til å synse. Stort sett til terningkast 1 klarer han litt for ofte å sette malen for meningsdannelser i kongeriket. Men en positiv effekt er selvsagt at dette også mobiliserer motsatt.

Versto er en betviler av alt som har med konspirasjonsteorier å gjøre. Dette har han selvsagt helt rett i. Verstos åpenlyse kommunikasjon med, flørting med og pidestallifisering av etterretningstjenesten, og hans tilhørende holdningsdannelse i det norske folk, er selvsagt heller ikke en del av en konspirasjon. I etterretningstjenesten selv kan man også vanskelig finne noe som ligner på konspirasjon.

Men forstokkede holdninger i embets medfør vil man finne, tilsvarende som hos Versto. Holdningene behøver heller ikke alltid å være av så høy demokratisk valør, selv om man innbiller seg det. Politisk interesse av holdningenes forlengelse via naive personer, som lar sitt ego beruse av å være lojal til et maktapparat, vil man også finne.

Verstos kommunikasjon med etterretningstjenesten og hans bidrag til å oppnå større åpenhet er sannsynligvis for det meste av det gode. For enda bedre demokratisk dybdegraving vil det gi raskest fremskritt dersom åpenheten belønnes, lar historie være historie, og at løgnen straffes hardt. Straffes meget hardt.

I denne åpenhetsprosessen må folket også sikres kommentatorer som har en bedre kritisk evne til disse kreftene enn det Versto har. Versto vil nok hevde at disse kritiske røstene eksisterer. Men ikke i en systematisk åpenhetsprosess, utøver de spesifikke høringer. Ikke stilt opp imot ham selv i hans egen avis. Og sjelden i aviser av betydning.

Nå vil det ikke være problematisk for Versto å henge seg på eventuelle kritiske røster mot den militære etterretningstjenestens manglende oppsporing av det internasjonalt farlige, med og uten umiddelbar spredningskraft til Norge. Disse oppsporingene er noe det er bred politisk enighet om. Det er også bred politisk enighet om at tjenesten skal gi mer og bedre informasjon om hva den foretar seg. Blant annet skal Regjeringen varsles foran operasjoner i utlandet. Dette er noe Arbeiderpartiregjeringen nå strammer grepet om.

Men stadig nye grepstramminger burde ikke bli en vane, en stadig maktkamp, slik det ser ut til å være. Man burde heller ikke se seg blind på at Arbeiderpartiregjeringen tar initiativ til dette, fordi dette Norges historiske maktparti har tendenser til å ikke å ha vilje til å komme til helt til bunns i noe som kan skape mer mørke pletter på dets egen historie.

Men nå skal all skitten fram. Ikke la bukken passe havresekken. Norges makt ligger mer og mer i Stortinget, og det vil være naturlig at etterretningstjenesten også står informasjonsansvarlig ovenfor Stortinget. Særlig fordi sikkerhetstenkning på kloden og i demokratiene avhenger av informasjon. Forholdene vil være farligere foruten informasjon, fordi debatten og innsatsevnen baserer seg på den.

Ja, konspirasjoner eksisterer. Kjernen er påstått sikkerhetstenkning og teknologisk herredømme, i fortsettelsen av den kalde krigen. Og mine damer og herrer, for å henspeile til de åndelige og teknologiske muligheter: UFO, besøk fra andre planeter, parallelle verdener og andre tider er en realitet. På verdensbasis, med hovedrøttene i USA, og konsekvenstenkende likt i de andre stormaktene, så kan dette hevdes å være den innerste kjernen i en verdensomfattende konspirasjon. Religionen og dens informasjonstilbakeholdelse var det tidligere.

Den konspirerende kjerne resulterer i styrt og redusert informasjon, hyppig bruk av avledning og desinformasjon, redusert demokrati, og redusert åndelig individuell og kollektiv utvikling. (Åndelig utvikling er av stor sikkerhetsmessig betydning). Viktige teknologiske nyvinninger blir fjernet før de kommer til markedet. Vi fått redusert vår evne til problemløsning. Kort sagt, vi har brukt noen tiår på å pumpe hodet fullt av begrenset viten og innsats, som vi strengt talt ikke hadde behøvd.

At det norske etterretningsvesen har noe særlig informasjon om disse tingene kan jo betviles. Det meste vil i så fall være av personlig dannet viten og interesse. Men at det ikke skulle finnes kanaler av innviede, og grader av innvielse, er det nok få nasjoner av stolte sikkerhetspolitiske selvbilder som vil ha på sin kappe.

Hva så med draptruslene i forbindelse med UFO-spørsmålet? som jeg personlig kjenner til to av her til lands, uten å ha forsket i temaet. Er de utsprunget fra en konspirerende kjerne, via kanaler, og deretter via eller direkte fra sin hovedkonspirerende kjerne i det respektive land? – Nei, ikke nødvendigvis. De kan vel så gjerne være utsprunget fra det forutsigbare i sjefslojalistenes strukturelle tenkeformer, årsak og virkning, som kjemiske reaksjonsmidler.

Både konspirasjonene og det konspirasjonsaktige dannes for det meste av frykt. I det konspirasjonsaktige har man blant annet frykten for å bli ledd av, frykten for ikke å bli tatt seriøst. Frykten for å miste egen status. Frykten for økonomisk tap kan være så sterk, at det i sum mer kan virke som en planetær konspirasjon enn som konspirasjonsaktig, og bidrar sterkt til den egentlige konspirasjonens enkle opprettholdelse.

Den antidemokratiske sikkerhetstenkende kjerne som man prøver å opprettholde, uavhengig av de politiske endringer og perioder, er som en institusjon, og institusjoner frykter forandringer. Særlig på saker som går imot dens egen opprettholdelsesdrift. Tro det eller ei: For disse kreftene - når man snakker om den kollektive sjefsfaktoren i dem pr. i dag - er det mer trygt å skape nye fiendebilder, og forlede verden inn i de farlige konsekvensene av dem, enn at andre skal få innsikt i deres tankehierarkier.

Enkeltindividet i disse institusjonene kan ha et godt hjerte og en god vilje. Men det er som hos legene; de vil menneskene godt, men deres kollektive bevisste og ubevisste sjefsfaktor motkjemper enkelte viktige fremskritt som kan true deres status.

Vi ser det også i Vatikanstaten. Paven ser ut til å være den som vil offentliggjøre paradigmeendrende informasjon fra deres store historiske bibliotek, som vil reformulere og omformulere deres religiøse oppfatninger. Han har kun sin egen samvittighet og snarlige fysiske død å svare for. Når det gjelder de folkene han har i rundt seg, så har de institusjonens opprettholdelse og tryggheten rundt egen maktbase å svare for.

Men her er det også massene som frykter forandringer. Her er menneskemassene selv med på å bidra til blandingene mellom konspirasjonen og det konspirasjonsaktige. Mennesker i posisjoner, vanlige mennesker i samsnakk med hverandre, – de er alle en forlengelse av en begrenset tankeform.

Det er mulig massene kan kalles medskyldig i det aller meste av hva som ligner på konspirasjoner og ondskap. Saddam Hussein ville ikke eksistert uten sitt eget folks hyllest og vilje til konfrontasjon. Hitler eksisterer ikke som en større historisk maktfaktor enn det han ble fordi vi konfronterte ham.

I hjemmet led de undertrykte kvinner og ofre av en snever oppofrende tanke. De lærte å tolke seg selv som ofre og mennene som undertrykkere. Men mangelen på konfrontasjon bidro til opprettholdelsen av mannens begrensninger og fravær av dypere sjelskontakt. Oppofringen, som resulterte i offertanken, var derfor en begrenset kjærlighetstanke. Dermed ble mannen også et offer, for befestninger av egen begrensethet. Dette slo tilbake på kvinnene selv.

Mannen konfronterte ikke kvinnens fremelsking av drømmen om den materielt rike og egne snarveier i det sjelelige perspektiv. Mannen konfronterte ikke de begrensede kvinnelige trådtrekkere og interne statusønskere på riktig vis. Han skapte religion, kommunisme og enda mer begrenset utøvelse av dem.

Men som ordspråket heter: "Mennene styrer verden, men kvinnene styrer mennene". Begge var maktutøvere og manipulatorer. Begge ble ofre for eget grep og egne konfrontasjonsmangler, først og fremst i seg selv.

Hvor massene ikke går til konfrontasjon er de medskyldige. Men det må være et spesifikt opprør, på noe man spesifikt kan ta tak i. For massene eier ikke alltid innsiktens redskaper til å konfrontere. Likeså er konspiratørene begrensede, formet av tidligere tiders makt, konspirasjoner og opprør av villedet art.

At ingen noensinne er offer kan bestrides og motsies i mange tilfeller. Men i et sjelsperspektiv vil man uansett måtte kvitte seg med offertanken, for å kunne komme seg videre.

Mens konspiratørene har mistet tillit til massene, så er det nettopp den man bør gjenopprette og vise seg verdig, Men ikke ovenfor disse kreftene. Bare ovenfor seg selv. Menneskene er guder som for å nå de høyere gudenivåene må vise sin dugelighet. Evnen til å skjelne mellom det høyere og det lavere, og konfrontere det mer begrensede, er et ufravikelig krav for å nå de høyere åndsnivåer. Sjelens krav om evolusjon blant de lavere bevisstheter er dertil nærmest ufravikelig.

Kjærlighet krever konfrontasjon. Kjærlighetens evolusjonære veier kan være tøff, men tøffere for de som ikke griper mulighetene og må vente på de neste.

Selvundertrykkelsen, selvmanipulasjonen og foringen av seg selv med negativitet er større enn alle utenforliggende manipulerende krefter. Ikke at man i stedet skal snu selvmanipulerende negativitet med positivitet, for dette kan gi en tilsvarende ubalanse og selvmanipulasjon. Men man må lære å "akseptere seg selv i nuet", som den vise sier. Akseptere at man er som man er, har gjort som man har gjort, befinner seg som man befinner seg, og så videre. Oppleve verden fra blanke ark. Innse det at ingen har en plettfri vandel fra dette og tidligere liv, men at man finner sin absolutte renhet med å være i det ytre som sjelen er i sitt indre. Alle vil det; vil oppdage hvem man egentlig er.

Fra selvakseptens blanke ark vil man lettere se sin egen ånd og åndelighet.

Åndelighet innbefatter å være praktisk tilstede i vår fysiske realitet.

De høyeste innviede i de sikkerhetspolitiske maktstrukturene er ikke skeptikere. Hadde de vært skeptikere ville de kunne ha motkjempet mulige teknologiske nyvinninger, og er derfor en trussel mot sikkerhetstenkningen innenfor disse kretsene. Skeptikerne har man mest bruk for utenfor.

Det kan godt tenkes at mennesker gradvis blir formet og vervet via losjer, frimureri og lignende, eller bare formet. Disse er makt og holdningsbaserte smeltedigler, som før i tiden resulterte i samkvemmet mellom religionen, godsherrene / pengemakten og staten. I dag kan det godt tenkes at det er de sikkerhetspolitiske maktmenneskene og pengemakten som kan ha sterke interesser av å finne hverandre. Her skapes kommunikasjonsnettverk bak den synlige delen av demokratiet, som av manglende tillit til demokratiet i visse tilfeller kan bevege seg i retning av å være antidemokratisk, særlig dersom denne kommunikasjonen samtidig har en sterk intensjon om å være formgivende i demokratiet.

Mye bra kommunikasjon kan foregå i disse losjene. Man kan observere det at superriktinger ofte kan ha sitt hjerte mer tilstede enn forbitrede misunnelige og fordømmende pengehigende normalmennesker. Men dersom man lar seg relativt forblende av en slik observasjon, av ensidig verstoaktige synsvinkler, så unnlater man altså å konfrontere de mer begrensede aspektene av disse kommunikasjonsnettverkene.

Eksempelvis vil det forefinnes mennesker med eierinteresser i tradisjonelle forurensende energisystemer tilknyttet disse kommunikasjonsnettverkene. Også mennesker med eierinteresser av noe som baserer seg på bruken av dem. Da forstår man at dette kan bli svært så innfløkt, også langt inn i politikken, og sikkerhetspolitikken, som blant annet baserer sin konvensjonelle styrke på disse energisystemene. En klar stillingstagende imot blir vanskelig, og grensene mellom antidemokrati og et konfrontasjonsudyktig demokrati utviskes. Uten å ville det bidrar politikere til å holde demokratiet borte fra den parafysiske teknologi, og dermed borte fra det selverklærte herredømmet til de konspirerende antidemokratene.

Hadde man spurt folket i et folkeavstemning, spesifikt på en slike saker, så er det ikke sikkert de forurensende energisystemene ville ha overlevd. Alternative energikilder og nytenkning ville ha begynt å florere. Og de over 200 patentene som eksisterer på det å få mer energi ut av et system enn man putter inn ville ha begynt å bli allment debattert og videreutviklet. Tilsynelatende evighetsmaskiner, hvilket de på sett og vis kan betraktes. Men pr. kvantefysisk definisjon transformeres det kvantefluktuerende, for oss potensløse, energihav til energier med potensialer, som vi fysisk kan utnytte.

Parafysisk kan vi i stedet definere det som at immaterielle energier, med potensialer i andre nivåer enn vårt fysiske, nedtransformeres til å danne potensialer på vårt fysiske plan, for dermed å kunne utnytte dem.

Parafysikken bryter med loven om energiens konstans i et fysisk perspektiv, men ikke i et helhetsperspektiv. Den kvantefysiske forestilling om at partikler kan oppstå fra intet og bli til intet igjen, er "slått på" i et uendelig kort tidsrom, er egentlig det reneste sludder. Men at det tilsynelatende tomme rom er mer energi enn den synlig og målbare materien selv, er et usynlig kokende energihav, - kan være en idévekker i retning av det immaterielle, for den som trenger det.

Det finnes mer subtile energiplan, parallellverdener, som fra deres perspektiv også betraktes som fysiske. Men enda dypere energiplan kan ikke betraktes som fysiske i det hele tatt. En grunnfilosofisk forklaring på parafysiske parallellverdener og energinivåer kan gjøres slik:

Naturens innerste tilstand er evig uforanderlig, derfor tidløs. Men det som er alt rommer det ubegrensede antall kombinasjoner av relativitet, som av kombinasjonsarter og interdimensjonalitet langt overgår vedkubben som rommer det ubegrensede antall av mulige figurer. Relativitet er ensbetydende med illusorisk evig bevegelse, som på vårt lave plan resulterer i en lineær rekkefølge av allerede eksisterende bevissthetstilstander, som er ensbetydende med oppfattelsen av lineær tid.

Troen på et utenforliggende objekts bevegelse fra A til B er en tankelås, en overtro, som skeptikeren ikke våger å betvile.

I stedet må den digitaliserte forståelse rettes mot bevisstheten og dets sanser selv. Man sanser aldri noe objekt, men påfølgende frekvensierte glimt. Den fysiske bevissthet er selv slike glimt, et fokus, en kanal i uendeligheten. Kanalen er av en slik ordensfaktor at illusjonens videreførelse fortoner seg som en utenforliggende bevegelse og lineær tid.

Man kan ikke avvise at vår evolusjonære utvikling leder til den absolutte lineære tids endelikt, og at nye oppfattelser av en annen ordensfaktor vil oppstå.

Bente Müller har selvfølgelig rett i sin bok "Gjennom Lysmuren" fra 1986; Det finnes like mye antienergi som det finnes energi. Det kan forklares enkelt: Den ubegrensede evig uforanderlige tilstand uten tid og rom kan ikke være usymmetrisk. Dermed finnes like mye antiretning som det finnes retning, dersom man skal sette en rombasert forestilling på det. Siden krefter har retning så vil det finnes like mye motkrefter, men kan eksistere i andre parallelle dimensjoner enn vår.

Energi og antienergi er aldri atskilt, for atskilthet ville bety rom, og bevegelse og endrede relativiteter i rom ville bety virkelig tid. Dette må kvantefysikerne erkjenne for at kvantemekanikken skal være logisk konsekvent. Men siden materialistene har en stor makt i kvantefysikken, så kan man med fordel overflytte denne konsekventhet og kalle det parafysikk.

Hva kvantefysikerne har anerkjent er at når man nærmer seg de såkalt partiklenes og atomenes kjerne, så nærmer man seg mer og mer energispeilet, men er feilaktig døpt virtuelle partikler og gluoner. Men ja, motsetningene er det gravitasjonelle lim, for i Absoluttets uforanderlige supersymmetri er nettopp motsetningene supersymmetriens absolutte garantist og opprettholder.

Antigravitasjon og frastøtning er lavere plans uttrykk for det som på det Høyeste Plan er den absolutte supersymmetri og gravitasjon.

Ja, mennesket er en del av supersymmetriens energispeil. Ja, speilet leder til en større illusjon om avstander enn speilet på badet.

Sett fra vårt perspektiv er disse antienergiene og høyere energier gjemt i parallellverdener. Men vi kan utnytte dem, deriblant teleportasjon. Vi kan "plukke dem ned", deriblant fri energi.

At man sannsynligvis ikke vil kunne klare å tjene så mye penger på fri energi er en annen sak, men viktig nok for begrensede sikkerhetspolitiske tenkere som ønsker å bruke det i argumentasjons og overbevisningsøyemed.

Men jeg kan avvente med å skrive mer om det i denne omgang, for å se hvordan verstoaktige tenkere roser det nåværende pengesystem og dets historie opp i skyene, og hvordan selvinnbilte fremskrittsvennlige økonomiske tenkere plutselig ikke blir så fremskrittsvennlige lenger, på noe som ikke ligner en videreføring av det eksisterende system, men et hopp til noe nytt.

Men selvrosende beskrivelser av overgangen til den parafysiske teknologi, som nødvendigvis snart vil bryte igjennom, parallelt med åndelig utvikling og ny økonomisk tenkning, vil også forekomme. Slik selvros, blant antidemokrater, og blant de som tenker likt som dem, vil være av interesse for det antidemokratiske individs behov for selvopphøyelse, av antidemokratisk sikkerhetspolitisk interesse for dannelsen av den kollektive oppfattelse, og av interesse for dem som ikke klarer å se og beskrive økonomiske relasjoner og utvikling som noe annet enn en uunngåelig historisk bane med en snever kontekst, basert på uunngåelige maktstrukturer.

Det kan også nevnes at store fremskritt basert på det eksisterende paradigmet har møtt mye motbør. Det er snakk om revolusjonerende forbedringer innenfor områder som allerede har vist seg markedsmessig svært nødvendige. Noen har falt igjennom på grunn av manglende investeringslyst. Andre har blitt oppkjøpt og dysset ned. Hvem dysser ned: Antidemokrater eller industrien selv? En kombinasjon av begge, sammenvevd i et omfattende nettverk?

Jeg har ingen forutsetninger for å vite helt klart om det følgende er en slik sak. Men eksempelvis i Fet kommune finnes det en oppfinnelse som er kjøpt opp av et amerikansk firma, General Electric. Oppfinnelsen karakteriseres som "å måtte omskrive historien", noe som hevdes å bli videreutviklet, de siste 5 år, noe de har måttet underskrive en taushetskontrakt på, noe som de som har vært i kontakt med dem har måttet underskrive en taushetskontrakt på.

Jeg har sporet opp navnet; Kjell Tore Målen, dersom noen ønsker å undersøke saken videre. Jeg vet ikke om navnet er stavet riktig. Norges Rikerud; Kjell Inge Røkke, har vært der, men har møtt en kald skulder.

Dersom dette er en slik sak, så tviler jeg på at dette er noe man har til hensikt å med det første slippe ut på markedet.

På lignende vis har jeg kommet i kontakt med mange som kjenner til en eller annen revolusjonerende oppfinnelse, som hevdes å være dysset ned. Det er merkverdig hvordan disse menneskene har konspirasjonsideer, også slike som ikke umiddelbart kan huske det spesifikke revolusjonære de har lest om, eller sett på TV om. Dessuten finnes mennesker med konspirasjonsideer som overhodet ikke er teknologi eller oppfinnelsesorientert. De er flere enn man tror, og kan ligge som en politisk gavepakning, for stemmefiske, for den som i politisk posisjon ønsker å ta tak idet. Men sannsynligvis må riksrefserne på dette området komme fra andre områder enn et politisk parti. Riksrefserne kommer fra mange områder, men den endelige styrke bak må nødvendigvis komme ifra media. Men media generelt preges av motvilje fra sjefsledd og eierskap, selvsagt uten at dette dreier seg om noen konspirasjon.

En forløsningssak er den mest sannsynlige handlingsdanner for politikerne, og at man dermed taper oppslutning hvis man ikke henger seg på.

Jeg har ingen forutsetninger for å påstå at tilfellet med antatt kald fusjon for noen år siden er en slik neddysset sak, eller om det, som det blir hevdet, bare var en falsk alarm. NRK’s offentlige skeptiker, Erik Tandberg, med sin bakgrunn fra forsvaret, mener helt klart at dette var falsk alarm. Men det er naivt å tro at det ikke finnes sterke krefter som vil dysse ned slike tilfeller, når de i framtiden skulle oppstå, hvor kald fusjon virkelig er en realitet.

Det er også naivt å tro at det ikke finnes visse antidemokratiske handlingsplaner for skeptisering rundt fenomener og teknologi, som lett lar seg opprettholde av skeptikermassen når de først er satt i gang. Et UFO-tilfelle med påfølgende ballongforklaring på nyhetene på TV2 for noen år siden kan være et slik tilfelle. Dette fryktgjør ganske lett den grå journalistmasse, deres lederskap og eierskap. Dersom man ikke skaper en journalistisk politisk rutine med å gå de såkalt naturlig forklarerne og deres forklaringsgrunnlag nærmere etter i sømmene, så vil eventuelle skeptiseringsprogrammer lett bli den styrende faktor. For at den demokratiske makt skal bli den styrende faktor må skeptiserernes økonomiske, sosiale og hierarkiske relasjoner kunne granskes. Gjerne sette det som krav for at de skal kunne slippe til i media. Dersom de ikke har noe å skjule, så vil jo dette lett kunne aksepteres.

Det er naivt å tro at det ikke finnes konspirasjonelle antidemokratiske krefter. Det er naivt å tro at antidemokratiske krefter ikke har sterke formuleringsevner. Det er naivt å tro at formuleringsevnene ikke benyttes til å få diverse politikere, parafysiske oppfinnere og andre til føle at de står ovenfor en overmakt. Det er naivt å tro at formuleringsevnen ikke benyttes som en underliggende trussel, kanskje uten å være en direkte trussel. Det er naivt å tro at de med sine formuleringsevner ikke klarer å manipulere andre inn på sine økonomiske og sikkerhetspolitiske synspunkter, med en klar formaning om at man ikke må messe med dem.

Vi har sett det før og kan komme til å se det igjen. I noen tilfeller vil man bortforklare UFO som hemmelig teknologi av jordisk opprinnelse, for å rettferdiggjøre hemmeligholdelse, og for å skjule de egentlige UFO kontakter og inspirasjon som har foregått, og for å kontroll med den videre dannelsen av bevissthet i folkemassene.

Det eksisterer ingen antidemokrater uten kontrolltanker, hvor kontroll kan være et mål i seg selv.

Ja, hemmelig jordisk teknologi har kommet fantastisk langt.

Ja, vi kan opprette en offentlig planetær politisk kontakt med utenomjordiske vesener av lysets krefter, få demokratisk kontroll på det, dersom mange nok står fram og svarer et rungende ja til det. Ja, kravet om dette må komme fra massene, men kan vanskelig komme uten en toveiskommunikasjon mellom media, politikere og grasrot.

Ja, vesenene kan være andre og av en mer negativ karakter dersom negative tenkere, antidemokratene, har den planetære kontrollen på det. Hvilken sikkerhetstenkende antidemokrat ville ikke forsøke å utnytte det teknologiske aspektet rundt en slik kontakt? Hvilken sikkerhetstenkende antidemokrat ville ikke tiltrekke seg vesener av egen kaliber? Hvilken sikkerhetstenkende antidemokrat vil ikke være ikke-naiv, sett andre ut ifra sin egen natur, og når han ikke har kontroll på det se disse vesenene som en stor trussel?

Dersom de konspirerende kreftene blir presset så kan et mulig scenario meget gjerne bli……Jeg avventer dette i denne omgang. Det vil bli snakk om kreftenes overbevisningskraft og journalistenes dømmekraft.

Jeg gjentar: De høyeste innviede i de sikkerhetspolitiske maktstrukturene er ikke skeptikere. Hadde de vært skeptikere ville de kunne ha motkjempet mulige teknologiske nyvinninger, og er derfor en trussel mot sikkerhetstenkningen innenfor disse kretsene. Skeptikerne har man mest bruk for utenfor.

Disse kreftene må bli forsøkt lurt til overflaten, dersom det ikke er politisk vilje til massivt å ta tak i problematikken, grave i den.

De konspirerende institusjoner, dens kjerne, ønsker å transformere sitt fiendebilde til et pr. i dag ukjent område, en ny form for kald krig tenkning. De vil med alle midler forsvare sin skjulte oppbygning av parafysiske våpen, inntil en allmenn dannelse av det nye fiendebildet, som gale Reagen ville bruke for å danne nedrustning mellom supermaktene. Ja, de vil senere propagandere at dette var eneste mulighet for felles nedrustning, framfor egentlige foreningsfaktorer og diplomati.

De vil argumentere for at folk flest ikke er modne for disse sannhetene, mens den reelle frykten er deres egen; Den institusjonelle trygghet og makttanke.

Parafysisk teknologi kan være farlig, som vi derfor må ha demokratisk kontroll over. Parafysisk teknologi kan være enda farligere i de antidemokratiske hender.

Når disse kreftene føler seg tvunget til å komme mer til overflaten, så har jeg ingen tro på at Olav Versto vil konvertere til mine synspunkter. Man vil hos han og andre kunne lese tingene direkte og mellom linjene.

Man må påberegne at kreftene bak deres sannheter vil være de sterkeste i en startfase. De vil hevde seg som selvstendige tenkere, men er dårefullt formet av en negativ del av tidsånden.

Hollywood-fantasiene vil nok ha sin påvirkning i det store og hele. Men den politiske seriøsitet vil mer og mer skinne igjennom, og da vil man se mer de åpenlyse krefter, både positive og negative, for hvor denne seriøsiteten ønskes å bevege seg.

Gerhard Helskog er hovedmannen bak TV-programmet "Rikets Tilstand". Han er riksrefseren jeg stort sett, i motsetning til Olav Versto, gir terningkast 4, 5 og 6.

Men han har ennå ikke touchet det jeg i disse fire artiklene er inne på. Spørsmålet er om han har evne og vilje til å gjøre det. Dersom han ensidig applauderer den kalde krig tenkningen, som han kan ha vist tendenser til, så kan han risikere å konvergere mer mot Olav Versto på dette området.

I Helskogs øyne synes mennesker med tilnærmede konspirasjonsteorier om Arbeiderpartiet å være de reneste tåper. Det kan være så. Men han burde være oppmerksom på at den kollektive tanke, som kan være ubevisst, kan være ondere enn den individuelle. Nye dybder kan kreve at han må finne nye kombinasjoner av kollektiv og individuell refs, og at han ikke alltid behøver å finne individuelle syndebukker.

Ønsker han å finne balanser for og imot på dette, nye dybder, med en tilhørende forståelse av det parafysiske, så må det være av demokratisk interesse at han får bevart sin posisjon og journalistiske selvstendighet, uten at han føler at han må foreta jobbevarende formuleringer.

Om Helskog er overdreven skeptiker eller ikke vites ikke i skrivende øyeblikk. Dermed vites heller ikke om han har kompetanse nok til å foreta riksrefsing på dette området også.

Dersom Helskog velger å være empiriker, så avskriver han ikke disse tingene.

The human race is a higher standing and lower standing race. It is left to itself for a while, for evolution and to prove its rightful place in the big perspective. Then will again communication on an official level take place.

The proofs are countless, everything from UFO to paranormal phenomenons, and more. But it is up to the individual itself to recognise them, strictly paradigmatic.

These skulls do not mean more for a sceptic than that they are having an interesting form. The most probable explanations they will come with are; "head knots and shrinking cultures", illness and hoaxes. But highly probable these are not the entire explanation, even if they in certain conditions not can be left out.

The worst sceptics are capable to mentions "the elephant man", the one with rare disordered outgrows on his head, and take a blow of other possible conclusions. This is a very primitive and unempirical attitude, and is not what we shall do here.

Found in???

Found in Peru

Found in Peru

Found in Merida, Mexico

Found in ???

 Found in ???

Reptilian race? Fantasy drawing of a claimed lovingly race and contact.

All to be found in the museum of Ica in Peru

A very good Internet Hoax? Claimed to exist in the museum of Ica in Peru. To smooth to be true. No nostril hole to be observed. Hook and teeth seems to fit badly. May later be claimed to be a fun act to show how easily fooled people are. But the unofficial answer may be to damage the cause.

Vietnam Alien, probably an Internet hoax, made by unserious guys with a knife, some chewing gum and some mud. Picture sent in anonymously.

What is the most primitive: The Hoax or those who made it?

Primitive Hoax made by very primitive earthlings, made to give fire for the skeptics, fire against the true sides of the phenomenons, and fire against serious research and researchers. This really should prove that skeptics are more easily fooled than true believers. The religious disbelief of the skeptics, and their religious belief of the non-proven fundaments of our science, will use such cases for their own prejudices about all sorts of real cases they dislike, without digging into the phenomenons.

Under the picture where I write "Primitive Hoax made by primitive earthlings…", Sims write "Jimmy Holmans information is true and accurate to the best of my knowledge. He has a lot of good information on his find."

Derrel Sims, Chief Investigator

Derrel Sims is a Registered Hypnotic Anestheiologist, Certified Master Hypnotherapist, Certified Master Neurolinguistic Practioner, International Speaker; investigator and Researcher of Alleged Human/Alien Enconters.

If you have an experience, or have evidence, and would like for Mr. Sims to review this information privately, with you. Respond in confidence to any of these addresses given here. All evidence materials are returned to the owners (if desired) after all testing is concluded to the satisfaction of Saber Enterprises and the Dream Team Professionals.

Mr. Sims’ primary work is gathering physical evidence from cases of alleged human/alien contact. This data is then reviewed by professionals in various fields. Some of Mr. Sims’ work is reviewed in the Royal Society of Chemical Engineers and other media.

There is no claim here, as to what an "Alien" is, as this seems to still be a hotly debated and ambiguous subject. Sims also makes no claim to what an "Alien Implant" is…as this has never been satisfactory established. There is no smoking gun by anyone, concerning this phenomena. Our original evidence and subsequent findings do not support that absolute. To say so is shortsighted and the burden of proof is upon the claimant

Jimmy Holman concludes, after a long treatise about him and Derrel Sims as invited or not invited, that he thinks this is a hoax. This reserved statement is taken even after a technical engineer, who he seems to recognize, wrote him: "Now, to the Alien Skeleton. Jimmie, I was there at the famed meeting, and it was certainly presented as a real alien. And a real skeleton! It was neither. I watched as various photographers took pictures of the display, including the ones on your web site. The pictures you have on your web page are of the display I saw in the house. I am not an expert paleontologist by any means. It does not take an expert to discern the inconsistencies in this display. The first thing I did was to touch the bones;. They were not bone, or even varnished bone. They were a plastic substance of some sort."

Although: Holman continues to present this as "Hoax or History?" on his page.

Fact: We have investigators, Derrel Sims and Jimmy Holman who "simply report what they find", but refuses to put to an end obvious Hoaxes.

Of course, the man who allegedly have created it, professor Slaughter, is dead. But claiming this to be the work of a dead man (not wanting to see how his own funny hoax fools around) could be the strategy of real antidemocrats. We will see if someone steps forth to make something more out of it.

After Derrel Sims wrote his respond I started to investigate Holman and Sims pages some more. That is when I found the plastic statement well hidden. But I also found it wise to warn people about Mr. Derrel Sims, Mr. Alien Hunter himself.

• He allows people around him, on his own web pages, to rice him up above the skies, as a great authority. This is a sign of a very low spiritual intelligence, although his intelligence can be high in other ways.
• The organization seems very hierarchical, where Sims is the dead end.
• Derrel Sims seams to be a "dead end putter", meaning that of the many hundred cases he have had, non of them are scientifically laid forth on the net, for the people to judge for themselves.
• He has no scientifically treatise/debate as wholeness, whether the implants are Human/Alien, the kind of technology, or if some are of such kind that they cannot have been produced on earth etc.
• His official position is that he does no claim what an alien is. He is good in putting skeptical opinions about his finds, without well-treatised references. But from his own pages and other pages one sees that he plants scary pictures, exactly like antidemocrats do. He wants others to conclude them alien.
• He juggles between skepticism, and the man who always has some new interesting stuff, enough to infiltrate. He is also selling stuff and telling thoughts others sells and tells anyway.
• One does not get any high spiritual feelings about his textures, when one as a trained person put aside the lower subjective agreeing and disagreeing ego.
• Some people may get the feeling of lower energy of political confrontators, in books or private, if they are in passages digging in the lower. Derrel Sims’ lower texture cannot be mistaken for being such a higher kind.
• Officially he gives the implants back to those who want, which means he makes sure not to leave behind any loose ends.
• He may use "under private eyes" as an excuse not to publish the cases. Before he officially uses that as an excuse, someone should tip him that the cases and the histories of the involved might be published without giving names.
• He is more than a drugoholic on getting cases. He is a diverter. He diverts inquiries and extraordinary cases to himself, away from (uncontrolled) publicity.

I am not placing this warning to convince others. I am placing this warning to alert those who agree, and those who wants to be alerted, but put up their own mind.

Of course, I cannot officially be absolute certain. Anyway, he has so many look-alike factors that he would be a tool for antidemocrats anyway, easy maneuverable and usable. Therefore I find it wise to warn about Derrel Sims, no matter what he is. This does also include his entire organization, and Jimmy Holman.

Derrel Sims is a former CIA. CIA has both democratic and antidemocratic individuals. Those antidemocratic individuals are a part of an antidemocratic net, which will find new infiltrating scholars after Derrel Sims, from own CIA ranks and from other ranks.

The antidemocratic scary picture is partly an organizational instinct of self-preservation. But it is a lot more to it than that. A lot of money is for instance included. Power sickness is included.

The antidemocrats will use any opportunity to accuse people like me to be romantics, love focused, not seeing the Real Alien Danger. "They do not know what we know, and do not have access to many of the resources, like we do." - This sentence shows a common attitude among antidemocrats. It is part of their religion.

But, dear politicians and journalists; I advice you to stand on the top of the pair of scales yourself.

Then we see some danger of some alien races, but not the antidemocratic kind. We take the antinaiveistic position, but not the antidemocratic kind. Pictured on earthly matters; We do for instance show a strong hand against Saddam Hussein and his people, a people not willing to fight him down. But we are not placing nuclear weapons in the east, wanting a full-scale war to test out frequency weapons, playing the hero role, taking full control over the introduction of paraphysical technology and introduce the alien enemy picture, which is the path of future history antidemocrats wants.

What do we do then? Do we trust these people when they want money to be able to shoot down and destroy comets? Or do we make some cleaning up and replace them with democrats? - Of course, the public demand is to be able to destroy comets, but also to get people that we trust to make such weapons, and to control them.

Most Alien races may look on us in the same way as we do on Saddam and his people; The Human race is a race that not yet has fought down its antidemocracy. The Aliens will support our evolution, but not have official contact before a certain face, when the time is in.

I am placing this to prepare you for the scary picture that will be drawn, even far worse than this. This is found on Internet on UFO sites; galleries of aliens, titled "Alien Baby".

I do not know the origin of it. It may be Hollywood. It may be human DNA research. It may be Alien. It may be a Human-Alien hybrid. It really doesn’t matter for the moment.

What matters is to look beyond.

We may see an innocent child. We may see it is a beauty of its own kind. We may se evil men who created it. We may see Humans/Aliens who wanted to do something good, but did not succeed. Perhaps they succeeded, from their kind of view?

If this of some political purpose was planted on the net, we may see an even scarier picture of those, because they will not reveal their true purpose. We may see they wanted to reveal the scary picture, and not a nicer looking alien baby. We may see those who want alien enemies, but we may also see those who want to prepare us for the unknown.

The beyond is to not automatically create racism against aliens, and to not automatically create alien enemies. But the beyond may also be to be very angry against those humans doing such research.

Be aware: Technology of antidemocrats may be the cause where we find hidden accusations against aliens. What are the antidemocrats capable of? – For instance:

"In 1975 did the soviet party boss Leonid Bresjnev propose in a speech that the superpowers should cooperate in the best interest of the human race to prevent the development of a new kind of weapons which he characterized as "even more terrifying than nuclear bombs". In the UN the same year foreign minister Gromyko promoted the proposal to forbid the development of weapons of such kind. However, it was never given any explanations on what kind of weapons that was on discussion, and therefore the Soviet initiative did not lead to anything." (The back introducing side of "Elektromagnetismen og Livet", by Vilhelm Schjelderup, Dreyer forlag 1987)

The weapons mentioned may be called frequency weapons.

Let us be aware of that antidemocrats have such weapons, not just for building a fence against nuclear weapons. Let us be aware of that antidemocrats have such weapons, when antidemocrats try to divert them to be alien.

They divert aliens as actually visiting earth, but divert the scary picture to those that know they are anyway. They divert the Erich von Dãniken view; aliens visiting earth in the prehistoric past. They divert DNA research from making an impact on evolution. They divert DNA testing from going on now.

But UFO-crashes are real. And the chance that antidemocrats will not try to mix humans and aliens is one to quadrocillion.

Can antidemocrats, to test out such frequency weapons, have done the cattle mutilations? Perhaps in combination with DNA research? - A gigantic program for DNA testing may be the real answer here. Perhaps also to test their respond during influence of radiation and other influences.

Mutilated horse. Accusing Aliens in UFO’s for doing this is too hasty. For those who are not introduced to the latest of UFO-research: Earthly antidemocratic technology, (a lot stolen from democrats and based on their research), has today come so far that some people claim up to 50 – 70% of the UFO sightings to be human technology.

The official answer will of course be that antidemocrats have not done such things. But then they also put themselves in a trap, when not wanting to reveal aliens visiting Earth. The real official position may then be to say nothing at all, before the time comes when they have to confirm it all.

What if aliens from outer space do these things? Can we then automatically call them to be evil acts? If they are sick and dying anyway, would not this just be to find out why?

Are antidemocrats good people on this matter, but not good not to reveal information to the people?

Did they even plant the scary picture into this man, supposingly a man with over 200 in IQ, Mr. Physics Himself; Mr. Stephen Hawking? He was stating in the biggest newspaper in Norway, VG, after seeing the film "Independence Day", that it just as well could happen on Earth. He is a fan of the "Star Trek" TV-series, and his statement could have been manipulated to the top level by negative forces.

How come that the biggest notice on UFO-matters that I remember, seriously presented, in the biggest newspaper of Norway was this statement of Hawking, and of Mr. Alien Hunter, before he introduced the UFO congress in Oslo in January 2000?

Is VG easily fooled, just as much as the UFO congress people and me? -Well, I was skeptical to Derrel Sims already then, as I also heard others were.

The correct conclusion is that antidemocrats have lines into media. But we do not know in what extent. Where there isn’t just reporting, being fooled / manipulated, – there can be insiders, or just weak people falling for and manipulated by security arguments. The international conspiracy conclusion though, is that antidemocracy is far into media. My advice to media: You are perhaps the most important key to revealing information on UFOs and aliens, and have to show some interest and responsibility.

http://207.1.103.215/Ahfluorescence.htm

Conclusion: We obviously have a man, Mr. Derrel Sims, who claims to find fluorescent marks on the victim before and after abduction, using an UV-lamp, is teaching women to become "kun-fu masters", wants other to conclude the abductors are alien, does not conclude what an alien really is, and do not take a clear discussion weather the marks can be made by humans or aliens from other space.

Derrel Sims does not either make a clear discussion between the notion "Contactee" and "Abductee". As he has shown; Contactees have remarkable marks on their bodies shown under the UV lamp.

As antidemocrats most Derrel Sims plays on important part collective consciousness. For instance those of women. Women all around the world suffers from violence, suppression, and from not being equal part of the social and political society, where they are truly needed as equal participators. But inner and outer fight causes some aggression, and also women to sometimes become too fast concluders. That is what Sims is playing on. Some women are victims, and wants to be given keys to shut the door. When they become stronger, do not provoke or say against them, because they are fast and strict reactors. Although not being so much those who write in the newspapers and forming the news, they have power to be the heaviest scale pan and form the opinion. Derrel Sims knows all this, and plays on it.

You name who have the power to form the opinion, and the antidemocrat’s plays on it. You try to fight the antidemocrats down, and they just find new levels of manipulation.

See the outer and false strength of a religious man, multiply this with 10, and you will se the antidemocrat. Se what the mafia was capable of, taking power over policemen, people of court and politicians, multiply this with 10, and you will see what antidemocrats are capable of.

They are capable of killing presidents and make treats against others.

They are masters of playing good Samaritans, without really being it.

They are the owners of security thinking, and use this as The Law behind treats, The Law behind assassinations, and The Law behind self-justification.

To catch the slippery eel, democracy has to take control over the security thinking, define what is to be considered as security thinking and what is to be classified as Top Secret. If antidemocracy takes part in this definition, a lot it lost. But during this process, they will have difficulties not showing themselves.

This may be the symbol of the antidemocratic slippery eel.

Beware of the Nibiruans. They are the hijackers and diverters. They are agreeing to lift the manipulative net on Earth. They have some light inside them too. But please see their top political acts, which for instance is to transform the enemy-picture into the universe, against other aliens.

Planet Nibiru. Zecharia Sitchin, a kind of Erich von Dãniken theorist, claims to have a lot of historical findings proving the existence of the 12^th planet and the Gods traveling to Earth. He have also found proofs that indicate they where DNA researchers.

According to Barbara Hand Clow, they are 4 dimensional creatures still operating on Earth. Some of us "are their faces" so to say, and the human race contains their genes.

This question is difficult to answer for the moment. But we see their path of hiding falls exactly into place with what the Nibiruans want to hide. We may later come to the conclusion (if we regard antidemocracy to be the rulers of Earth, because of what they are capable to prevent us from reaching) that Earthlings may not be the real rulers of Earth.

We do also know that the antidemocrats, in order to get alien technology, got to come in some kind of conflict with an alien race, which not was of the highest race, for instance because of giving technology to antidemocrats. The situation came out of control, we know the claim that it was this that brought it to the presidential level, causing Ronald Reagen to say in three different occasions that we perhaps need a common enemy from outer space, which also fitted into his own goal and purposes; disarmament of nuclear bombs with the Russians.

Reagen (to the right) proposed a common alien enemy picture to Gorbatsjov.

But the alien enemy picture started all the way from the beginning. The Nibiruan kind of fears (which antidemocrats have inherited, and project manipulatively with that the people is not ready to know yet) was into it all the way from the start. Everything of antidemocratic acts still fit into the Nibiruan kind of fear. The antidemocrats may be ruled by manipulation, without even knowing it.

We do also know that antidemocrats are having official contacts with aliens. In what extent are the top chief antidemocrats influenced by this Nibiruan race? In what degree are they incarnated Nibiruans and feel loyal to their origin? In what degree are they using holograms to walk among us?

Not a TV-screen, but a big version of what you probably played with as a child.

Picture taken from one angle….

….Picture taken from another angle. Not just Hollywood. Ufologists claims aliens are walking among us, with a far more developed technology on holograms than we have. Some aliens are also so look-alikes that they do not need holograms.

How does this antidemocratic – Nibiruan manipulation net work? – Find the key of decision, where it is made, and who makes it. Become the one who makes it. Create a chief factor behind and surround the decision. Create the correct lies around it. What will then happen?

Decisions made in one organ have great tendencies to pass through all the rest. Let us call it the zombie law of state and bureaucracy.

Create a strong hierarchical classification system of security. Make sure to gradually transform the minds of those who rise in security levels. Take in the most loyal ones, but those who also stand on their own feet and are able to think for themselves. They are the ones who will preserve their status and continue the kind of thinking, stand against rebellions, and transform of necessity.

From this the zombie law will continue to exist, defended by security arguments, top-secret marks and loyal men. Even the good presidents cannot fight against it.

Derrel Sims had revealed that he also was working on skulls and footprints. Since I am not a very loyal guy, when I smell something of the lower kind, I reveal his private information. He also probably wanted me to. He is a master of publicity and to make himself interesting. But I advice people to be extra suspicious when the full media cover comes, from whomever and wherever, if these claimed findings ever exist.

My unfinished article emailed to Sims contained some information on some 60cm footprints I found, but not pictures of them. Below this information Sims wrote: "I have some footprints in stone I am reviewing now. These are not the Paluxy river tracks… Which are pretty good."

This information and sentence could contain different motives:

• He wanted me to send him pictures of the prints, to give me negative feedback and put an end to it.
• They are either planning to put more hoaxes into the market.
• Or introduce a new world picture, where for instance the findings in the list later in this article are included. They cannot hold back any longer, and wants to take full control over how it will be introduced. These guys know they can decide the world picture for the skeptics.
• Wanting my attention to the Paluxy river tracks could show how they are planning to introduce this new world picture. My 60cm footprints (which I do not know what are) of a humanoid are not easy to fit in, unless calling it a giant prehistoric gorilla, Bigfoot or something like that. Again; these guys know they can decide the world picture for the skeptics.

Such big things would be difficult for them to put in an evolutionary picture anyway, not wanting to include Alien visitations and intervention, and not include DNA testing and research. But they may soon introduce an extension of our prehistory, beyond the 1-2 million years, already having the views for different occasions ready for the skeptics and their new skeptical position.

Derrel Sims did 4 times refer to the same link. First time, below the segment: Certainly, some of the research to access more feelings may go wrong. One of these groups causing partly negative impact of the human genes are claimed to be the Anunnakies, partly from the planet Nibiru.

Below the one and only segment about Zecharia Sitchin:

Below my segment: "Let us assume that Quantum Theory not only is for particles, but also collective connected to different kinds of collective consciousness, their belonging bodies and their type of common evolution":

At the end:

These are the only pictures on the Internet of a very famous scholar (27.july.2001).

Hi!

The chief questionable guy under the alienhunter dot org site wrote me, after sending him a part of my unfinished article on alien skulls, asking him about the hoax on the holman dot net / ufo / -site:

Can you give a short and quick statement on this, which I will put in my article? I would like the respond to include a front face image of Mr. Sitchin.

The alien hunter seams to have great interests to stop the historic and prehistoric DNA testing idea.

Zecharia has no official comment on this new debunker. The following comments are from me the webmaster.

I have had my own conversation with Mr. Heiser and his attempted debunking of Zecharia's work. I did discuss with him that his attempt to personally attack Zecharia and give alleged motives for this deception is a true telltale sign that he is a simple debunker that is trying to make a name for himself off the efforts of someone else. He does not have a body of work to stand behind, but he has his degrees which does not strengthen his position on this subject. At this time in our re-telling of the Earth's true history. I would rather stand behind Zecharia who has been writing for 30 years and

has 8 books under his belt, than behind any academic who is trying to maintain the old party line and take us back 100 years or so in thinking. Mr. Heiser thinks like a debunker would, that if he shows how a few words are mistranslated than Zecharia's whole work is invalid. The problem is that Mr. Heiser is incorrect about his view of the translations. But that is what debunkers do, they take a single point, distort it, try to pollute the complete work, and make a name for themselves tearing the other person's work down and making personal attacks. In fact Heiser advertises his web

page as an attack on Zecharia. Don't you see how he is not trying to add to the body of knowledge but tear down the body of knowledge. He is not competing with, to raise everybody up but he competing against to break everybody down.

I have personally traveled with Zecharia to 4 countries so he could show all of us in the group the physical evidence for ourselves that he has written about. I have seen the evidence with my own eyes, and walked through ancient structures aligned with astronomical perfection. I have seen stellas, carvings, pictures and depictions all giving strength to Zecharia's supposition that have nothing to do with translating a few words here and there.

Here is some information for you that will help you decide what to write. It is a small lesson in the types of data.

Type 1 data = scientifically, testable, repeatable, observable data that all people can observe. Any human can go to the museums I have been to and see the evidence for themselves. Any human can see the ancients texts or cylinder seals.

Type 2 data = multiple witness testimony with no physical evidence remaining. For example, several people see a shooting star and then it is gone.

Type 3 data = a single witness testimony with no physical evidence remaining. For example a UFO sighting with no pictures.

Zecharia Sitchin and his work is all based on type 1 data. All of us can observe the evidence for ourselves and that is why Zecharia has had trips all over the world so we can see for ourselves with our own eyes the evidence he has written about. When Zecharia translates ancient texts he usually translates with an open mind that the stories are not fantasy but reality based, using old language and limited understanding. Most academics consider all ancient stories as myth. Even though in several cultures they

have the same story.

Here is a copy of a letter, a Sitchin fan wrote me after she sent it to Heiser.

Dear Mr.Heiser:

I have read all of Sitchin's books and none of yours so far. I have my own conclusions about Sitchin's findings but I have come to some conclusions about your website (www.facadenovel.com), your challenges, and you credentials. First, having a Ph.D in ancient languages, as you go out of your way to impress upon others, does not contribute to more than contemporary orthodox translations and thinking, or you wouldn't have gotten your Ph.D.

Second, being a Messianic Jew myself, I can tell you that Christians, despite all of their studies and Ph.Ds in ancient languages, could not possibly interpret Hebrew correctly nor other language texts that were written in ancient languages by Jews because you do not understand the Jewish context in which they were written. So, too, do I have an issue about your criticisms of Sitchin and his knowledge of the Hebrew and ancient languages spoken by the Jews.

So let me get this straight: what you are saying is that someone who is Jewish and has spoken and read Hebrew and other ancient languages, from the context of that written by Jews and Hebrews, can't possibly understand how the languages translate? I think you have it backwards. Based on your information, it appears to me that you are no more than another Christian fundamentalist trying to prove your apocalypse theories by taking someone else's lengthy and difficult life's work and turning it into a travesty for the sake of fundamentalist Christians.

This is no different than what the Vatican did when it tired to turn the Dead Sea Scrolls into documents intended only to support their form of Christianity and as both the Vatican and the Southern Baptists did with the New Testament. You might want to read the Jewish New Testament. Maybe it'll humble you but I rather doubt it.

Again, I have not read your book and I am sure there is some valuable information, if not new, about the UFO experience, but I am part of the UFO community as well, and have had my own personal experiences to draw from. Maybe you should do some real scholarly research and come up with something creative and new instead of leeching off of someone else's detailed life's work for your own advantage. But I guess that would have taken you another twenty years and you wanted to make sure you got your name in the limelight before then.

From Sitchin’s official web page: "According to Sumerian texts reported by Zecharia Sitchin in his books "The 12^th Planet and Genesis Revisited, ADAM was the first genetically modified primate, some 300.000 years ago!"

Contains information about the 223 genes that do not had the required predecessors on the genomic evolutionary tree.

Contains information about the number of human genes (30.000+) and the small difference between humans and other species. The difference between Man and Chimpanzee is about 300 genes. Each gene consists of thousands of "letters", A-C-G-T that stand for the initials of four nucleic acids that spell out all life on Earth.

Without your statement, I would have stated nearly the same; that disagreements on a few words cannot tear down a great mass of findings, contexts and their documentation, even if Sitchin at the end should show up to be wrong.

My source to the 12th planet, Nibiru, is "The Pleiadian Agenda", by Barbara Hand Clow. I am not always using scientific sources. But I look forward to read Sitchin on later occasions. He goes the right way; new paradigms needs proofs and the proofs going out to the masses, for them to judge for themselves.

I have some more questions, if you would please like to answer:

• Do Sitchin have findings showing the path of the Nibiruans up until today?

The classic Hubble Deep Field image, taken in 1995, revolutionized the way astronomers looked at the universe. A seemingly empty patch of the night sky turned out to be filled with distant galaxies in a multitude of shapes and colors. Using the non-local idea of quantum physics and the non-existence of time and space on the quantum level, traveling with the speed above light and teleportation is not impossible. Immediate action at a distance was for instance shown by the Aspect experiment.

• Antidemocrats work on a level hiding UFOs and historic DNA research. The Nibiruans work on an even higher manipulative level, infiltrating those who know antidemocratic infiltration exist. Skeptics do not recognize such kind of web sites anyway. I write, putting this to be the view of the Nibiruans: "We, the Nibiruans, are the chief manipulators of Earth now. We do not want communication with other alien civilizations. We do not want other alien civilizations to mess with our creation. Humans reaching multidimensionality above the nine means reaching above the Nibiruans DNA technology, our multidimensional access and our capability to manipulate and operate on Earth." It is interesting that the Nibiruan kind of fear falls together with the antidemocratic kind of fear and how to operate. Barbara Hand Clow may be correct. I understand that Sitchin cannot scientifically comment on this. But can he scientifically rule out the possibility that the Nibiruans are operating on Earth today, defending their creation and operations?

I have to state, I do not draw the scary picture of aliens, even if we cannot be naive against a few races. This does not justify antidemocracy though, and their kind of operations.

By not willing to put to an end such an obvious hoax as the one on the www.holman.net site, I simply distrust your scientific judgment. Good judgment is always needed in science, since science always bases itself on something given, which themselves are judgments. Not being capable of the correct judgment one way, I simply distrust your scientific judgment the other way, and I will not advice other people to let them be taught by you "the correct scientific method".

I see you are spreading the scary picture, and that is probably your mission. I see you are a diverter.

Concerning your guess; that I am using Zecharia Sitchin as my authority, I have to tell you that I haven’t read a single word from Sitchin’s books. About DNA testing and so on I am just referring to logical ideas, what is possible, historically and prehistorically. I understand though that Sitchin refers to historic DNA knowledge, which is very interesting.

My writings are not scientific. My mission is to spread ideas, in a logical and philosophical manner, also pointing on bad logics and conclusions of science. This can be more powerful than giving the public 1500 pages of dull and incorrect documentation. It can more powerful to let people easily make up their own conclusions, and my facts and speculations can help on that, perhaps combined with their own references to science.

I am referring some to Barbara Hand Clow, the author of The Pleiadian Agenda, mixing it with a few ideas of my own. The Pleiadian Agenda is not a scientific book, and as you know, I cannot refer to her scientifically. But as a contactee myself I know some things, and I take the advantage to get ideas from whomever I want. I have to remind you, that Albert Einstein himself claimed that he liked to dive into "The Secret Doctrine" by Madame Blavatsky when he was stuck. Madame Blavatsky is by some people claimed to be the starter of the New Age movement.

Calling you an antidemocrat is simply my own judgment. They are simply not using me to look on you as an enemy, using me against you. Spiritual guidance is not telling, but helping people to make their own judgment, their own decisions, and to learn from their own decisions. By acting from my own judgment I see the will of it. By seeing the will and act of my judgment, I see the strength of it. I feel my strength, but perhaps seaming arrogant to others, a "better knower" and an over ruler. Spiritual guidance includes the individual’s own judgment, will and strength, and its own wise conclusion to shut its mouth.

I am calling you an antidemocrat. Mr. Sims. Please sue me, and let us get some action.

Please sue me, give me the opportunity to confront you, and let me grow stronger. Let me observe my own and your humbleness into it.

Please sue me, and let others get the opportunity to judge for themselves.

Please sue me, show your kind of authority, and let people debug you as an authority if they want. But also give people the opportunity to find answer themselves, concluding the authority inside themselves, if they want to.

When I explained to you that type 1 data was where Mr. Sitchin, scientists, researchers, astronomers and myself formulate our beliefs and opinions. Then you will understand that anything that is not based on type 1 data but is instead based on type 3 (single witness opinion) data is something we will not comment on. You have to judge for your own mind and life which opinion to let into your belief system.

I do not accept any of the statements of Barbara Hand Clow or take her information inside or change opinions that were based on type 1 data. In fact when it comes to Pleiadians, only Billy Meier is an acceptable source of information. This belief is based on 3 years of study of Type 1 data, that you can of course look up yourself with regards to the Meier case. The physical evidence in this case will take you years to research if you can get it. What physical evidence has Mrs. Clow revealed that would strengthen her contention she had personal conversations with Niburians? You see I can't accept a statement claiming to be coming from the Niburians themselves.

You also said "They were DNA researchers. That means partly access to our consciousness..." This is a conclusion that you have made or accepted but how do we know this is true. It can't be tested and this evidence is not revealed in the ancient texts. How is DNA research connected with access to our consciousness?

I have not seen any good type 1 evidence that the munitions used in Kosovo were frequency weapons and not depleted uranium. In fact the reports I have seen are of illness that could be attributed to depleted uranium. They may have used both types of weapons.

I don't like this term antidemocrats being used as a blanket statement.

Last comments: Mr. Sitchin has made many public statements to the following subject of reptilian intervention into our past. Mr. Sitchin has seen NO EVIDENCE of any reptilian influence in our past.

Mr. Sitchin has no comment on the current location of Nibiru.

You see, I am an contactee myself, but do also have to do some speculations, because spirit is based on judgment, free will, acts and strength. Using frequency weapons in Kosovo is an information I got, which I cannot use 30 years to prove. I have to base my writings on that, and to those readers who wants to feel on it. I have to write things that may offend many people, and cannot base them on sales numbers.

When it comes to type I data, they are also, as you say, based on individual judgment, and judgment are based on the spirit, with its relativity, contexts and so on. Scientific methods or not, it all comes back to the spirit.

Is religion the answer? -No. Is science the answer? -No? Is spirit the answer? -Yes, if one doesn't fasten to opinions. Right the moment you have the right answer, a new one takes over. One has to have ones feet in every stall, and in the same time in no one of them.

Monotheism, atheism and pantheism are all correct.

My point is that science must base on empirical attitudes, which means to be open-minded. Sitchin comes to a level, and does good work up to that. Sitchin must twist around his views to come to newer and more correct views and conclusions. Jews must twist around their views. Christians must twist around their views. I must twist around my views.

If 300.000 years ago is a scientific finding/conclusion of Sitchin, then he is perhaps just digging in a little part of the truth. And that is a small part of spirit. Findings of sculls and humanoid footprints from all from 4 mill years old to 600 mill years old is also just a part of spirit. But if spirit goes beyond time and space, all historic views are just parts of spirit. If all is one and spirit goes beyond time and space, spirit may be a far higher and faster truth-finder. But the truths are anyway individual.

My point was that Sitchin cannot scientifically rule out the possibility that Nibiru-Annunakies operates today, because this ruling out is not empirical. If he does this for his own sake, it is his own choice, and it is perhaps not wise to ask him such questions. My point is also that Barbara Hand Clow may go a more direct path to truth, and one cannot scientifically rule out that possibility. My mission is to tell people about the spirit, which may be bigger than the physical body, and a more direct path to truth. Since science is judgment, Spirit is science. Since spirit may be multidimensional, then it may be higher science than physical science.

Physical science was necessary to reach above limited religion. In that way physical science stood above limited spirit.

Anyhow, if all is based on judgments, even of Sitchin, then we all have to work together to rise the spirit. Is parapsychological capabilities higher spirit?

-Not necessary. But the path free of false shortcuts is, and will lead to expanded spirit and capabilities.

My writings may offend Jews in various ways. My speculations now is that Akhenaten was an era-changer, created monotheism, which is correct, but also very correct for its time, because the "gods" were not wise to take for models any more, and was mixing totally into the homogeneous mass. The humanity had to find their inner self, but was not ready to take full responsibility for themselves jet, without any outer or inner "rulers". There is research the may show that Moses was influenced by Akhenaten. My guess is that the Nibiruans, with Jehovah, a Nibiruan, diverted your people, and now the world, and took it to that kind of manipulative control, even if a lot of light shines through.

By the way. I do not believe Nibiru can be classified as a Pleiadian planet. I believe that is part of the manipulation and diversion. Nibiruans fear what incarnated Pleiadians are capable to achieve.

Sitchin is mentioned on the front side of http://inannareturns.com. I guess that has nothing to do with his type 1 classification.

Now I can show you the problem with using opinion or the spirit as your proof of evidence, instead of physical evidence. The Raelian movement started by Rael, who claims to have met with the Elohim: The same ones that the Bible is written about have much to say on Jehovah, Yahweh etc.

They say that not only is Jehovah still alive but he is an alien who is their commander still and was there commander in the bible days. They have mastered cloning which is the real everlasting life talked about in the

Bible, according to their material. They also claim to have created all life on Earth in the last 25,000 years and don't believe in a soul, but only scientific cloning as opposed to long living soul. They are not Niburians, but come from a different solar system far away. Rael claims to have met this character. There reasons for picking the Jews is clearly explained but I don't want to say it here. Rael has 50,000 followers (the most of any ufo group) and has never provided physical evidence.

Barbara Clow claims that Jehovah was a Niburian. He was a taskmaster. She has not provided physical evidence (unless you know otherwise).

According to the Billy Meier material, which is backed up by years worth of physical evidence. Jehovah was the third in line after 3 generations of similarly named top scientists that wanted to be treated like gods even though they were not. He demanded blood sacrifices and demanded worship. He was not from Nibiru, although Billy does recognize beings from Nibiru that were active in the Sumerian area. Gilgamesh was a descendant from them.

And according to my research, whoever Yahweh was... when he traveled his ship landed with dust, smoke and fumes. It also gave off radiation that lighted Moses skin. He also gave them a lunar calendar to follow, and killed thousands at a whim, when his word was not followed precisely. He demanded blood sacrifices and special meals in the desert. He was seemingly a

taskmaster that allowed the killing of thousands of idol worshipers instead of making them converts. This evidence is from the Bible itself, a document edited and translated so many time I can't count that high.

He sounds a lot like the Billy Meier story as opposed to the Biblical god of creation that I would assume would love all creatures and people equally if they were his creation. But you know what, in the Bible Yahweh never claimed to be the god of anybody but the Hebrews.

Who is the most correct? Which evidence do we follow? Where do we stop and just say we really don't have a clue?

We seem to agree about much.

The Rael group seems to be a UFO religion, no real spirit, although some light will shine through there too, and people will finally experience, see and learn what is low spirit, which we may say often is the only way to higher spirit.

Spirit as my proof of evidence? -Yes, and science and physical evidence is part of spirit, which very often stand above beliefs and speculation. If all is one, everything is connected, and therefore everything is consciousness, spirit. All contexts that we possible are able to find are to be drawn into it.

When it comes to the bible, I recognize it and do not recognize it. The Bible was written by people too, and views are always subjective and relative, no matter the highness of parallel worlds of energy, Gods and their reality. If Jesus came down and told you something, it is just relative, and it also has to pass through the forehand understanding of the individual. But the possibility that energies of big contexts (which is big contexts of consciousness (if all is one)) will shine through is very high. If God is everywhere at the same time, and if God an quantum particles is outside time and space, they do not leave behind holes, like in a cheese from Switzerland, because then God would not be everywhere at the same time, and the particles would somehow be surrounded by space on every side, which means to be inside space. The outside time and space-notion leads logically to a everywhere point, like a everywhere before Big Bang point, the only that is Absolute, a point without comparing, which means unlimited energy and zero energy at the same time. Through this, everything is connected to everything. This Absolute state is the highest potential of the spirit, but also the lowest, because this absolute state of consciousness doesn't compare, doesn't conclude etc. This state contains relativity, which equals to illusory movements, which on our low level equals to illusory linear time. The innermost existence is eternal unchangeable and eternal changing at the same time.

Perhaps spirit is working between us right now? What you find in the bible about Yahweh and Moses is very interesting. Perhaps the translators did not understand this point entirely as dangerous for their belief, and therefore a good opportunity came for you.

When it comes to Barbara Hand Clow and Jehovah as a Nibiruan? - I do not know. I just know that I find very must in her book that speaks to my soul, that has great contexts, although I do not use her as an authority. What speaks to my soul is an authority, personal spiritual science. I have no authority unless myself, and that authority is often wrong, as everybody else. I see everyone as authorities, and I have something to learn from everybody. Spirit works through all and do never stop. If it stops, it stops in a relative sense.

I also know that many persons have claimed to be exactly the same person in that previous life. Do we then have the conclusion that nil or just one of them are correct? - No, not necessarily. Spirit can scan into whatever it is, and can be misjudged as previous lives. And for instance: Spirit has parallel pasts, parallel futures and parallel now's. We may have X and Y combinations of crossing worlds, and many pasts crossing into our now. How many Erik Parker exists? - Countless, not just as your different personalities, but also as real independent personalities in different parallel worlds. Your reality, and time, is not to move from A to B inside space. Time is successions of states of consciousness.

Can I prove this for others unless creating an UFO? - No, my intension is to make people interested, those who want to. My intension is not to drag evidence above other people’s head. I believe though, I am capable to create an UFO, if I got the time and money. I could create some easy stuff, anti-gravitation, if I did not prior writing all my free moments.

If science is used to convince, judgments can fasten, and that is lowering of the spirit. Evidence is always individual. Even if we as big groups choose the same evidence, there is the same number of contexts to it as it is individuals, and even more, because contexts change in the individual all the time.

All is relative.

By the way, I saw a UFO yesterday ca. 24:00. First it moved like a satellite, shining, on clear sky. Then it became weaker, on clear sky, and then it did suddenly shoot fast and disappeared some distance away, all on clear sky. Does it matter? - No, it was just a little point on the sky. Spirit matters. Spirit does not matter. Evidence type I matters. Evidence type I does not matter.

I use type 1 data to prove the existence of the soul. This, you are going to like.

I am sure you have heard of Edgar Cayce. Well all of his readings were documented and recorded by a transcriber and he was not even aware of his statements while in the trance state. His sons are still alive and along with the records and his institute, a real physical evidence based work of knowledge is available for anyone to see. Cayce made more than 15,000 medical diagnoses and predictions, 99% have come true. In fact I think his sons wrote a book describing the ones that haven't yet come true. All of his writings are still available from his institute or through bookstores.

From this starting point one can prove beyond a reasonable doubt that at least one man had the capability to know things that were impossible to the physical human and can only have been done by the spiritual human. In fact while Cayce was alive reporters were trying to prove he was a fraud and they came back and wrote that he wasn't and he was indeed a real prophet. Cayce said that his ability was something that all humans had if they would exercise that part of themselves and enhance the ability. For example all humans share a similar experience that goes like this.

You think about someone and they call, you haven't seen someone for along time, think about them and then meet them. All of these are experiences of the soul or spirit.

That is how you use type 1 data to prove the soul or spirit is real.

I do like what you say. I would doubt the 99% thought, but I cannot deny it. I do not think we shall put the demand for 100% correctness of clairvoyant capabilities. But Edgar Cayce might have chosen key factors that the universal spirit gravitates on for the necessity of evolution almost anyway, that are very equal in different parallel realities, and pushes X and Y combinations into the realities in a slightly different manner.

Some people claims we came to a different path around 1986, around the ERA of Gorbatsjov. Some people claims we avoided the Nostradamian 3^rd world war. But, operating with the correctness of the parallel worlds, this war is expressing itself in different parallel realities, and these expressions can come back to us, if

******

******

Such cases as the Derrel Sims case make it necessary for serious UFO organizations of the other kind to do some separation, to clean out and purify, and by this also make a clear position for the public.

The Norwegian UFO-organization NETI has for instance taken the clear political standpoint that aliens in fact visit us from outer space and other worlds. Beyond skeptical programming there is 100% certain evidences that we in fact are.

Norwegian organization for the study of ExtraTerrestrial Intelligence.

If we as UFO organization do not take a clear position for; whom do we want to get the strength to take it for us? It is better to be laughed at than more easily being infiltrated. It is better being laughed at than not taking position and strength.

From this new position we will still take the scientific evaluation, whether the findings; the skull, is historic, prehistoric, caused by sickness, alien from outer space, human-alien hybrid, historic or prehistoric DNA science, and mixing, sexual interaction between quite different alien races (who had lived on earth for a while, or not). In fact, we cannot even rule out those strange creatures from mythology, for instance with mixings of humans and animals. A lower moral though, but it cannot be left out.

This is a position even more scientific open-minded, and therefore a more correct scientific position than the skeptical rule out position.

Front view of normal, same age skulls with mystery skull.

Deformed Human, Alien or Hybrid?

Preliminary investigation shows the skull to be about 200 years old.

Many races. Many interests. Different kinds of genetic contributions. Different historical views and angles may all be correct. In a certain phase earth became a protected evolutionary area by the galactic UN.

A human gave birth to this.

An Alleged Alien Hybrid, Photographed After Being Brought Aboard The USS Shiloh in August 1999. I think it is real. But I do also believe that someone sooner or later will claim it as a forgery. I will then advice media to do a very good research of those coming with this claim, their communication lines and so on.

Here is one of alleged alien races that have visited Earth (shown on diverse internet sites). after UFO-crashes and so

Alan L

Diverse literature claims that one of the main reasons for some alien races to hybridize, is to get genetic codes to develop their emotional bodies, that they for some reason are short of, and necessary for their further development.

Certainly, some of the research to access more feelings may go wrong. One of these alien groups causing partly negative impact of the human genes are claimed to be the Anunnakies, partly from the planet Nibiru. The late historic start of this research and impact are claimed to be about 7200 before Christ. Nibiru are claimed to be the 12^th planet, circulating between Earth and Sirius in a period of 3600 years. The reptilian Anunnakies is partly a negative race. With access to our genes, they had and have manipulative access to our cells and mind. Knowing the codes they can scan, and they can form, for instance by using frequencies. Barbara Hand Clow claims they where planning to take over Earth around year zero. (Probably not by wars, witch would have been discovered in the universe, but by infiltrating presence and incarnations.) She also claims that Jesus Christ’s transmuting of wine into blood (meaning higher and non manipulative dimensions was coded into the blood, cells and genetic codes) made the earthlings lesser manipulative.

She further writhes in "The Pleiadian Agenda", page 158: "The Anunnaki Caesars realized what Christ was doing by transmuting wine into blood, and they immediately tried to shut this power down by taking total control of it. Many of you still have emotional bodies that are controlled by religious belief systems and physical bodies that are controlled by the medical establishment. There will be a great fight as you move into the Photon Band. This battle will occur within each one of you as each of you takes back your integrity."

Let us suppose that those traditions that claim there on this planet have been four prehistoric humanity-caused wipeouts are correct, where the Atlantis tragedy 11500 years ago was the last. Let us for instance recognize archeological findings that indicate prehistoric atomic explosions.

Let us operate with the thought that some of the Peruvian findings may be from such Eras. Perhaps the Godly Egyptians also was a rest from such Era. But let us also suppose they were space travelers. Let us suppose that humanoids by the same reason have communicated and are a dominating life form in vast areas in the universe. Let us suppose that high developed humanoid races existed along with our monkey stadium, like gorillas and chimpanzees exists along with us. Let us suppose that we some day find out we must leave the Earth-scene, to give the evolutionary arena to other races. Let us assume that this does not necessarily have to be by space traveling, but may as well be a switch of dimension, with another geography and surroundings in space. Let us assume that Quantum Theory not only is for particles, but also collectively connected to different kinds of collective consciousness, their belonging bodies and their type of common evolution.

Let us assume there existed highly evolved technology, perhaps remains, even in periods where our paradigm claims history was more primitive. Even in our known history.

300-600 million year old footprint The 10.5-inch footprint appeared to have been made by a human wearing a sandal. The location was Antelope Springs, about 43 miles northwest of Delta, Utah. The known age of mankind on Earth is believed to be no more than one to two million years ago. (More on

Paluxy River Tracks, dozens of human footprints along with dinosaurs.

Red = additions

Human skulls with horns were discovered in a burial mound at Sayre, Bradford County, Pennsylvania, in the 1880’s. Horny projections extended two inches above the eye-brows, and the skeletons were seven feet tall, but other than that were anatomically normal. It was estimated they were buried around AD 1200. Some of the bones were sent to the American Investigation Museum in Philadelphia, where they seem to have disappeared.

In 1837, a number of tiny human skeletons from 3 to 4 ½ feet tall